Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:10.55041/IJSREM.GSTCOS041

PERFORMANCE IN TRANSITION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ON-SITE, REMOTE, AND HYBRID WORK IN IT ORGANIZATIONS

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

10.55041/IJSREM.GSTCOS041

Volume:

10 |

7 |

Jul 2026

Pages:

1-7

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/ijsrem.GSTCOS041

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

NPN

N P Nandini

Department of Business Management,

Sri Krishnadevaraya University(SKIM), Ananthapur & Assistant Professor CMR Technical Campus, Hyderabad.

Download Author Certificate
D

Dr.B.Anitha

Department of Business Management,

Sri Krishnadevaraya University(SKIM), Ananthapur & Assistant Professor CMR Technical Campus, Hyderabad.

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

The rapid transformation of workplace structures following the COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally changed how organizations manage employees and evaluate performance. The Information Technology (IT) sector, due to its digital readiness and knowledge-based operations, became one of the earliest adopters of remote and hybrid work arrangements. This conceptual paper examines the comparative impact of on-site, remote, and hybrid work models on employee performance in IT organizations.The study reviews existing literature, industry reports, and organizational practices to evaluate workplace effectiveness across five key dimensions: productivity and output quality, employee engagement and motivation, collaboration and communication, work-life balance and well-being, and innovation and learning. The findings suggest that each work model offers unique advantages and challenges. On-site work strengthens collaboration, mentoring, and organizational culture, while remote work enhances flexibility, autonomy, and focused task execution. The paper argues that employee performance is influenced less by physical work location and more by organizational culture, leadership effectiveness, digital infrastructure, communication quality, and employee support systems. The study concludes that hybrid work represents a sustainable and effective workplace strategy when supported by inclusive policies and outcome-oriented performance management systems.

KEYWORDS

Hybrid Work Remote Work On-Site Work Employee Performance IT Industry Workplace Flexibility Organizational Behavior Employee Engagement.

Cite This Article

N P Nandini, Dr.B.Anitha, "PERFORMANCE IN TRANSITION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ON-SITE, REMOTE, AND HYBRID WORK IN IT ORGANIZATIONS," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1-7, Jul 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem.GSTCOS041

Full Article/Conclusion

The future of work within IT organizations is increasingly defined by flexibility, digital collaboration, and employee-centered workplace design. While on-site work remains important for collaboration and organizational culture, remote work provides autonomy and flexibility. Hybrid work models offer the most balanced and sustainable approach to employee performance. Organizations that successfully align workplace flexibility with strategic objectives, leadership effectiveness, and employee well-being are more likely to achieve long-term competitiveness and organizational resilience. The study concludes that workplace effectiveness is determined by a combination of organizational culture, leadership practices, technological readiness, and employee support systems. Hybrid work emerges as the most adaptable model because it accommodates diverse employee preferences while preserving opportunities for collaboration and innovation. However, successful implementation requires thoughtful planning, clear communication, and continuous evaluation.

References

Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383–400. Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218. Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. Z. (2020). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655–683. Davenport, T. H., & Pearlson, K. (1998). Two cheers for the virtual office. Sloan Management Review, 39(4), 51–65. Donnelly, R., & Johns, J. (2021). Recontextualising remote working and its HRM in the digital economy. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(1), 84–98. Eurofound. (2020). Living, working and COVID-19. Publications Office of the European Union. Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. Gartner. (2022). Hybrid work trends and future workplace strategies. Gartner Research. Golden, T. D. (2006). Avoiding depletion in virtual work: Telework and the intervening impact of work exhaustion on commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 176–187. Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 53–62.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

7/4/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...