Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM10897
Volume:
5 |
10 |
Oct 2021
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Data pipelines that support the processing of Big Data have become the building blocks of modern analytics and are already achieving critical outcomes for companies that are able to process huge amount of data in a timely, resource efficient manner. There are a number of tools Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers: Elastic MapReduce (EMR), Redshift, and Glue that operate as distinct, but linked, data processing tools in the lifecycle. Yet, these services need to be tuned in terms of parameters, resources and workflow. In this paper, we investigate several optimization strategies such as memory management, partitioning strategies, concurrency tuning, tradeoffs between cost and performance. Finally, we propose a novel way for benchmarking and tuning AWS data services that is backed up by empirical performance tests. We quantitatively analyze the impact of key optimizations on execution time, resource utilization and cost efficiency through mathematical models and empirical analysis. We validate that strategic tuning of EMR, Redshift, and Glue can improve performance by up to X% and reduce costs by Y%, meaningfully extending capacity limits and aiding data engineers and architects alike.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
10/26/2021
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...