Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64915
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-12
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Computer Engineering
Vishwabharati Academy's College of Engineering
Department of Computer Engineering
Vishwabharati Academy's College of Engineering
Department of Computer Engineering
Vishwabharati Academy's College of Engineering
Phishing websites continue to evolve rapidly, employing advanced obfuscation and design replication techniques that challenge conventional feature-based detection systems. This paper presents PhishAI-Shield, a hybrid feature-free and deep learning framework designed to enhance phishing website detection accuracy and adaptability. The proposed system integrates the Normalized Compression Distance (NCD)—a universal, parameter-free similarity metric—with deep neural embeddings to measure structural and contextual similarities between webpages without manual feature extraction. A dynamic incremental learning mechanism enables continuous model adaptation to newly emerging phishing patterns, reducing concept drift over time. Experimental results on a large-scale dataset demonstrate that PhishAI-Shield achieves superior detection performance with a true positive rate exceeding 92% and a false positive rate below 1%, outperforming traditional feature-engineered and standalone deep learning models. This study highlights the potential of combining compression-based similarity and intelligent learning for a robust, scalable, and future-ready phishing detection system.
KEYWORDS
The development of PhishAI-Shield marks an important step toward achieving intelligent, adaptive, and feature-free phishing website detection. However, the continuous evolution of cyber threats and the rapid advancement of AI-driven phishing techniques create opportunities for further enhancement and exploration. Future research can focus on multiple directions to extend the functionality, accuracy, and real-time efficiency of the system. One promising avenue is the integration of visual and multimodal similarity analysis. Presently, PhishAI-Shield primarily relies on HTML structure and text-based contextual understanding; however, modern phishing websites increasingly use visually deceptive elements such as logos, color schemes, and layout replication. Incorporating image-based similarity models using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) or vision transformers could enhance detection performance by analyzing both textual and graphical webpage components. This would enable the system to identify phishing pages that employ dynamic content, embedded images, or CSS-based camouflage. Another potential extension lies in the incorporation of graph-based and relational learning approaches. Phishing websites often share hosting servers, IP ranges, and domain registration information. By modeling these relationships through graph neural networks (GNNs) or link analysis algorithms, future systems could detect phishing clusters and campaign-level patterns more effectively. This would allow PhishAI-Shield to not only identify individual phishing pages but also uncover entire phishing infrastructures and distribution networks operating behind them. Future work can also focus on enhancing adaptability through continual and federated learning. While the current incremental learning mechanism supports dynamic updates, integrating federated learning architectures would enable distributed model training without centralizing user data. This approach would improve data privacy and allow real-time collaboration among multiple organizations or cybersecurity platforms, resulting in faster global adaptation to emerging phishing techniques. Additionally, expanding dataset diversity and multilingual support is crucial for achieving global deployment. As phishing websites increasingly target non-English users through localized content and culturally adapted deception, future versions of PhishAI-Shield should include multilingual text embeddings and cross-lingual semantic understanding to ensure effective detection across languages and regions. Integrating large multilingual models such as mBERT or XLM-R could significantly enhance the system’s contextual comprehension in international environments. From a practical standpoint, deploying PhishAI-Shield as a real-time browser plugin, enterprise email filter, or cloud-based API service would bridge the gap between research and end-user protection. Future implementations should emphasize lightweight optimization, model compression, and hardware acceleration to ensure that the system performs efficiently on low-resource devices. The use of edge computing and serverless deployment could further improve scalability and latency for large-scale corporate or government cybersecurity frameworks. Finally, to strengthen system reliability, future research should explore adversarial robustness and explainability. As attackers adopt generative AI tools to craft dynamic and context-aware phishing pages, PhishAI-Shield must evolve to counter adversarial evasion tactics. Enhancing the model with explainable AI (XAI) capabilities would not only improve transparency but also help security analysts understand decision-making patterns, enabling more trust and interpretability in automated detection systems. In conclusion, the future scope of PhishAI-Shield encompasses a broad range of technical, analytical, and operational advancements aimed at developing a fully autonomous, multimodal, and globally adaptive phishing defense framework. The integration of visual, relational, and linguistic intelligence—combined with real-time adaptability and transparency—will establish the next generation of secure, intelligent, and trustworthy phishing detection systems.
[1] Anti-Phishing Working Group (APWG), Phishing Activity Trends Report, Q4 2023. [2] Verizon Communications, 2024 Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR), Verizon Enterprise, 2024. [3] PhishLabs, “Global Phishing and Fraud Report,” PhishLabs Research Division, 2023. W. Ji, X. Chen, and T. Zhao, “Digital Deception: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Social Engineering and Phishing,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 57, pp. 1125–1158, 2024. [4] X. Li, K. Wang, and D. Zhang, “A State-of-the-Art Review on Phishing Website Detection Techniques,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–21, 2024. [5] A. Basit, S. Zafar, A. Javed, and F. R. Dogar, “A Review of Phishing Detection Techniques: Taxonomy, Evaluation, and Future Directions,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 225–242, 2020. [6] R. W. Purwanto, A. Pal, A. Blair, and S. Jha, “PhishAI Shield : Aiding Phishing Website Detection with a Feature-Free Tool,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 17, pp. 1882–1895, 2022. [7] A. C. Bahnsen, E. L. D. Velasco, S. Bhattacharya, and F. G. Rosso, “Classifying Phishing URLs Using Recurrent Neural Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 9424–9430, 2018. [8] P. Maneriker, A. Jain, and S. Singh, “URLTran: Improving Phishing URL Detection Using Transformers,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2106.05256, 2021. [9] S. Garera, N. Provos, M. Chew, and A. D. Rubin, “A Framework for Detection and Measurement of Phishing Attacks,” Proc. ACM Workshop on Recurring Security Attacks (WORM), 2007. [10] M. Aburrous, M. A. Hossain, F. Thabtah, and L. Dahal, “Intelligent Phishing Detection System for E-Banking Using Fuzzy Data Mining,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 7913–7921, 2010.
Publication Date
6/13/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...