Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67493
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Information Technology
D.G Ruparel college Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Department of Information Technology And Computer Science
D.G.Ruparel college,Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Phishing websites are one of the most common cybersecurity threats on the Internet. These websites are designed to look similar to legitimate websites and trick users into sharing sensitive information such as usernames, passwords, banking details, and personal information. Traditional phishing detection methods, such as blacklists and rule-based techniques, are useful but may fail to identify newly created or unknown phishing websites. To overcome these limitations, machine learning and deep learning techniques can be used to automatically identify suspicious websites. This paper presents an overview of phishing website detection techniques and examines different features that can be used to distinguish phishing websites from legitimate websites. These features include URL-based characteristics, domain information, hyperlinks, webpage content, and security-related properties. Machine learning algorithms such as Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Logistic Regression can be applied to classify websites as phishing or legitimate. The study also discusses recent approaches involving deep learning and explainable artificial intelligence. The main objective is to improve detection accuracy, reduce false positives, and provide better protection against evolving phishing attacks.
KEYWORDS
Phishing attacks are a major concern in today’s digital world. Cybercriminals often design websites that appear similar to trusted websites and use them to collect users’ confidential information. If users enter their details on such websites, they may experience problems such as stolen passwords, financial fraud, identity theft, or misuse of personal information. The proposed Phishing Website Detection system can help identify suspicious websites by examining different characteristics of a website. These characteristics may include the URL structure, domain information, use of special characters, webpage content, and other unusual patterns. After analyzing these features, the system can classify a website as either legitimate or phishing. Machine learning can make the detection process more useful by identifying patterns from previously collected website data. One of the useful features of a phishing detection system is its ability to alert users before they share sensitive information with a suspicious website. Such early detection can help users avoid fraudulent websites and reduce the possibility of becoming victims of online scams. It can also contribute to safer browsing practices and improve users’ awareness of cybersecurity threats. However, phishing techniques continue to change as attackers develop new methods for creating realistic-looking fraudulent websites. Therefore, detection systems should be regularly improved by using updated datasets and newer detection techniques. Along with automated security tools, user awareness is also necessary because safe browsing habits play an important role in preventing phishing attacks. In conclusion, Phishing Website Detection can support a safer online environment by identifying suspicious websites at an early stage. Combining automated detection, machine learning, updated security methods, and user awareness can help reduce the risks associated with phishing and protect users from common online threats.
[1] Y. Zhang, J. I. Hong, and L. F. Cranor, “CANTINA: A content-based approach to detecting phishing web sites,” in Proc. 16th Int. Conf. World Wide Web (WWW), 2007. DOI: 10.1145/1242572.1242669 [2] G. Xiang, J. Hong, C. P. Rose, and L. Cranor, “CANTINA+: A feature-rich machine learning framework for detecting phishing web sites,” in Proc. 5th ACM Symp. Information, Computer and Communications Security, 2010. DOI: 10.1145/1755688.1755698 [3] R. M. Mohammad, F. Thabtah, and L. McCluskey, “Predicting phishing websites based on self-structuring neural network,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 25, pp. 443–458, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-013-1490-z [4] R. M. Mohammad, F. Thabtah, and L. McCluskey, “Intelligent rule-based phishing websites classification,” IET Information Security, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 153–160, 2014. DOI: 10.1049/iet-ifs.2013.0203 [5] S. Sheng et al., “An empirical analysis of phishing blacklists,” in Proc. 6th Conf. Email and Anti-Spam (CEAS),\ 2009.Open paper [6] L. Tang and Q. H. Mahmoud, “A survey of machine learning-based solutions for phishing website detection,” Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 672–694, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/make3030034 [7] A. Aljofey et al., “A systematic literature review on phishing website detection techniques,” Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.01.004 [8] M. Moghimi and A. Y. Varjani, “New rule-based phishing detection method,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 53, pp. 231–246, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.048 [9] A. K. Jain and B. B. Gupta, “A machine learning based approach for phishing detection using hyperlinks information,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s12652-018-0816-z [10] R. S. Rao and A. R. Pais, “Detection of phishing websites using an efficient feature-based machine learning framework,” Neural Computing and Applications, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-019-04268-7
Publication Date
9/25/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...