Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64376
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Computer Science Engineering
RTC Institute of Technology

Computer Science Engineering
RTC Institute of Technology
Computer Science Engineering
RTC Institute of Technology
The report aims at describing the architecture design for a detailed Placement Management System (PMS) for higher education. We begin with a literature survey of academic studies and commercial offerings, identifying common features (e.g. student/recruiter profiles, job postings, eligibility filtering, interview scheduling, offer tracking, and analytics) and gaps in existing practice. System requirements are obtained in Methodology and layered architecture (UI, Application Server, Database) is proposed and relation data model (ER-Diagram is introduced as a relational data model). We discuss technology stack options (e.g Web framework, database, cloud etc.), and highlight security/privacy (encryption, access control, FERPA/GDPR compliance). A plan of testing and deployment including unit/integration tests, user acceptance and CI/CD Items to consider during implementation: UI responsiveness, ease of integration with student information/LMS and HR/ERP systems (in order to access current academic/recruiter data), scalability and maintenance. We have estimated a per module development effort (refer table & chart below) and would like to describe our pricing choices (in-house / commercial / fully custom). A modern PMS by virtue of stakeholder process and information integration provides realistic administrative benefits as well as improved placement results.
KEYWORDS
By implementing a separate Placement Management system campus recruitment can move from a disjointed, manual process to a strategic plus point for the college. Institutions also save time and decrease error as student jobs can be placed with a single database that then manages all aspects of the matching, interview, and offer process. Analytics and transparency create increased accountability (e.g. for accrediting bodies), and richer student profiles with integrated LMS data lead to better matching and higher placement rates. We have established a structured methodology to be used in creating such a system: specifying requirements, research on available solutions, system architecture proposal and consideration for other implementation issues (security, integration, scalability). Diagrams (architecture and ER) and tables of features/effort support the design. Vendors supply most of these components ready to use but an institution may decide on a closed source or open-source system to satisfy its needs. In all these instances careful planning, like the one shown, has been critical. To sum up, good PMS has less paperwork but positive results. The gains for the student (better careers advice), the recruiter (checked applicants) and the university (good reputation and statistics) far outweigh the cost of developing an updated, comprehensive placement portal.
· Liva Jorge. “Transforming Campus Recruitment with Placement Management Systems.” Medium, Mar. 30, 2023. (Defines core features of PMS: profiles, postings, scheduling, etc.). · Pradeepa R. et al. “Smart Placement Management System with Intelligent Career Support.” IJERT, vol. 15, no. 04, Apr. 2026. (Proposes AI-driven career guidance in PMS; discusses architecture and benefits.). · K. Priyanga et al. “Smart and Automated College Placement System.” IJERT, vol. 13, issue 05, June 2025. (Discusses inefficiencies of manual placement; presents React/Laravel/AWS architecture with analytics.). · Christian Balondo, Kristine Samson. “The Need to Develop a Career and Placement Management System…” Univ. of Nueva Caceres (research study, 2019). (Case study highlighting manual challenges and need for PMS.). · OpenEduCat. “Placement Management Software.” (Feature page describing campus recruitment portal with eligibility, scheduling, reports.). · Oréll Software (Placify). “Orell Placement Management Software.” (Product page; highlights end-to-end campus recruitment solution with secure workflows.). · Creatrix Campus. “Placement Management System.” (Solutions page; details student, placement team, and company features.). · Camu Digital Campus. “How a smart Placement Management System simplifies Campus Recruitment.” (Blog; outlines key PMS features and integration points.). · Vidyalaya LMS. “Online Training and Placement Management” (FAQ; explains features of placement module – profiles, scheduling, tracking, analytics.). · EDU ERP (Indian ERP vendor). “Placement Management System for Colleges & Universities.” (Marketing page; discusses centralization, AI-driven matching, and ERP/LMS integration benefits.).
Publication Date
5/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...