Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67537
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-12
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Food Technology
Laxminarayan Innovation Technological University
Food Technology
Laxminarayan Innovation Technological University
Plant-based fermented beverages are gaining attention as non-dairy foods that combine the nutritional diversity of cereals, millets, nuts and seeds with beneficial biochemical changes induced by fermentation. This critical narrative review examines recent advances in the processing, fermentation, nutritional modification and quality of plant-based fermented beverages, focusing primarily on studies published during 2016–2026. Pretreatments such as soaking, germination, cooking, enzymatic hydrolysis, milling and homogenization influence nutrient accessibility, fermentable carbohydrate availability and physical stability. Lactic acid bacteria are widely used for controlled fermentation, although their performance depends on the substrate and strain. Fermentation may improve protein solubility and digestibility, reduce selected antinutritional factors, modify phenolic compounds, generate organic acids and aroma compounds, and enhance texture through exopolysaccharide production. However, these effects vary among substrate–culture combinations. Cereal- and millet-based beverages often face limitations related to protein content and colloidal stability, whereas nut- and seed-based beverages present challenges involving fermentable sugars, lipid oxidation, allergenicity and emulsion stability. Composite cereal–nut and millet–seed formulations may provide nutritional and technological complementarity. Future research should emphasize matrix-specific starter selection, storage stability, sensory validation, micronutrient fortification and strain-resolved functional evidence. Overall, plant-based fermented beverages represent promising food systems requiring matrix-specific formulation and processing strategies.
KEYWORDS
Plant-based fermented beverages are heterogeneous food systems whose quality is determined by interactions among raw-material composition, pretreatment, microbial metabolism and storage conditions. Fermentation can improve acidification, flavour, texture, nutrient accessibility and selected antinutritional characteristics, but the magnitude and direction of these changes are matrix- and strain-specific. It should therefore be regarded as a controlled bioprocess rather than a universal solution to the limitations of plant-based foods. Cereal and millet matrices offer accessible carbohydrate and diverse fibre and phytochemical profiles but often require improvements in protein density, particle control and colloidal stability. Nut- and seed-based beverages can contribute protein and unsaturated lipids but demand careful management of fermentable sugars, oxidation, allergenicity and emulsion stability. Composite formulations offer a rational route to nutritional and technological complementarity, provided that interactions among ingredients are experimentally optimized. Future progress will depend on matrix-specific starter cultures, stronger process standardization, rigorous storage-stability studies, meaningful sensory evaluation, appropriate fortification and careful distinction between analytical indicators and demonstrated health effects. With these principles, fermented plant beverages can develop as scientifically designed foods with their own nutritional and sensory identity rather than as simple imitations of dairy products.
1. Chalupa-Krebzdak S, Long CJ, Bohrer BM (2018) Nutrient density and nutritional value of milk and plant-based milk alternatives. International Dairy Journal 87:84–92. 2. Erem E, Kilic-Akyilmaz M (2024) The role of fermentation with lactic acid bacteria in quality and health effects of plant-based dairy analogues. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 23:e13402. doi:10.1111/1541-4337.13402. 3. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, Morelli L, Canani RB, Flint HJ, Salminen S, Calder PC, Sanders ME (2014) Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 11:506–514. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66. 4. Horlacher N, Oey I, Agyei D (2023) Learning from tradition: Health-promoting potential of traditional lactic acid fermentation to drive innovation in fermented plant-based dairy alternatives. Fermentation 9:452. doi:10.3390/fermentation9050452. 5. Kulaksız Gunaydı ZE, Cakmak Kafadar G (2026) Plant-based dairy alternatives: comprehensive insights into technology, functionality, nutrition and health. European Food Research and Technology 252:189. doi:10.1007/s00217-026-05122-8. 6. Łopusiewicz Ł (2024) Comparison of homemade and commercial plant-based drinks (almond, oat, soy) fermented with yogurt starter culture for fresh consumption. Fermentation 10:35. doi:10.3390/fermentation10010035. 7. Mäkinen OE, Wanhalinna V, Zannini E, Arendt EK (2016) Foods for special dietary needs: Non-dairy plant-based milk substitutes and fermented dairy-type products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 56:339–349. 8. Montemurro M, Pontonio E, Coda R, Rizzello CG (2021) Plant-based alternatives to yogurt: State-of-the-art and perspectives of new biotechnological challenges. Foods 10:316. doi:10.3390/foods10020316. 9. Ramsing R, Santo R, Kim BF, et al (2023) Dairy and plant-based milks: Implications for nutrition and planetary health. Current Environmental Health Reports 10:291–302. doi:10.1007/s40572-023-00400-z. 10. Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, Mattarelli P, O’Toole PW, Pot B, Vandamme P, Walter J, Watanabe K, Wuyts S, Felis GE, Gänzle MG, Lebeer S (2020) A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 70:2782–2858. doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.004107.
Publication Date
9/28/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...