Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65724
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-13
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Business Administration
Government Arts and Science College, VEDARANYAM. Tamilnadu INDIA

Business Administration
Government Arts and Science College, VEDARANYAM. Tamilnadu INDIA

Tamil
Government Arts and Science College, VEDARANYAM. Tamilnadu INDIA

Business Administration
Government Arts and Science College, VEDARANYAM. Tamilnadu INDIA

Business Administration
Government Arts and Science College, VEDARANYAM. Tamilnadu INDIA
The 2026 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election marked a watershed moment in Indian political communication, as the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK)—a party less than two years old—secured 108 seats and 35% of the popular vote, breaking the six-decade Dravidian duopoly of the DMK and AIADMK . This study conducts a comparative analysis of digital advertising efficiency across major political parties in the election, examining spending patterns on Google and Meta platforms between January and April 2026. Drawing on transparency data from Google’s Ads Transparency Centre and Meta’s Ad Library, the research finds that TVK achieved a cost-per-vote of approximately ₹18.40, compared to DMK’s ₹42.70 and AIADMK’s ₹56.30—representing efficiency advantages of 2.3x and 3.1x respectively. The study identifies three strategic factors underpinning this efficiency: (1) a decentralized, supporter-driven amplification model utilizing 85,000 fan clubs as micro-influencers; (2) strategic avoidance of expensive Google inventory in favor of organic and Meta-based reach; and (3) Tamil-first, emotionally resonant content designed for rapid consumption on mobile screens. These findings contribute to scholarly understanding of digital political communication in non-Western contexts and offer practical lessons for campaign strategists, regulatory bodies, and democratic citizens concerned with the transformation of electoral politics in the age of social media.
KEYWORDS
The most significant finding concerns the role of organic (unpaid) amplification in the TVK campaign. Exit polling data suggests that approximately 62% of TVK voters first encountered the party through WhatsApp forwards or social media shares from friends and family, rather than through paid advertising. Among first-time voters, this figure rose to 78%. This peer-driven discovery mechanism dramatically reduced the TVK’s required paid advertising spend. Rather than paying to reach each voter directly, the campaign paid to seed content that spread organically through existing social networks. The fan club network of 85,000 clubs functioned as an initial seeding mechanism, with each club member circulating content to their personal networks. The DMK, by contrast, relied almost entirely on paid reach. While the party’s ads reached large audiences, each impression came at a cost. There was no equivalent organic amplification mechanism, as the party lacked a distributed network of trusted messengers.
§ Dommett, Katharine, and Sam Power. “The Digital Transformation of Political Party Communications in the United Kingdom.” Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 72, no. 4, 2019, pp. 825-846. § Fowler, Erika Franklin, Michael M. Franz, and Travis N. Ridout. Political Advertising in the United States. Westview Press, 2020. § Goldfarb, Avi, and Catherine Tucker. “Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness.” Marketing Science, vol. 30, no. 3, 2011, pp. 389-404. § Kreiss, Daniel, and Shannon C. McGregor. “The ‘Arbiters of What Our Voters See’: Facebook and Google’s Struggle with Policy, Process, and Enforcement around Political Advertising.” Political Communication, vol. 36, no. 4, 2019, pp. 499-522. § Pal, Joyojeet, et al. “Political Messaging on WhatsApp in the 2019 Indian General Election.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 54, no. 48, 2019, pp. 41-48. § Pandian, M.S.S. The Image Trap: M.G. Ramachandran in Film and Politics. Sage Publications, 1992. § Rajagopal, Arvind. “The Celebrity in Indian Politics: From Celluloid to Social Media.” BioScope: South Asian Screen Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, 2019, pp. 7-25. § Sinha, Subir. “Digital Political Campaigns in India: Expenditure, Targeting, and Regulation.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics, vol. 19, no. 3, 2022, pp. 289-304. § Street, John. “Celebrity Politicians: Popular Culture and Political Representation.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 6, no. 4, 2004, pp. 435-452. § Udupa, Sahana, and Srirangam Venkatraman. “Digital Dravidian Politics: Social Media and the Transformation of Tamil Political Communication.” International Journal of Communication, vol. 13, 2019, pp. 3421-3441. § West, Darrell M., and John Orman. Celebrity Politics. Prentice Hall, 2003. Data Sources § Election Commission of India. “Tamil Nadu Assembly Election Results 2026.” 4 May 2026. § Google Ads Transparency Centre. “Political Advertising Data: Tamil Nadu Elections 2026.” Accessed May 1-15, 2026. § Meta Ad Library. “Political Advertising Data: India, Tamil Nadu Region.” Accessed May 1-15, 2026.
Publication Date
6/30/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
39
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...