Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREMWP58753
Volume:
10 |
3 |
Mar 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Accurate forecasting of library book demand is essential for efficient collection management, budgeting, and ensuring reader satisfaction. This study presents a comparative analysis of three ensemble learning algorithms—Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Decision Tree—for predicting the number of times a book will be borrowed in the next month. Using a synthetically generated dataset of 1000 library records enriched with engineered features (e.g., book age, availability ratio, borrowing rate, seasonal indicators), we evaluate model performance using R², RMSE, and MAE. Hyperparameter tuning was performed on the Random Forest model via grid search with cross-validation. Results indicate that Linear Regression achieved the highest test R² (0.5977), while the tuned Random Forest yielded an R² of 0.5430, demonstrating moderate predictive capability. Feature importance analysis revealed that popularity score, previous borrowings, and availability ratio are the most influential predictors. The study provides a practical framework for implementing data‑driven demand forecasting in library settings and includes a saved model artifact for deployment.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
3/19/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...