Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67547
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-15
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Research Scholar
Vignan University, Vadlamudi
Associate Professor,
Vignan University, Vadlamudi, Guntur-522213, Andhra Pradesh.
Professor,
Vignan University, Vadlamudi, Guntur-522213, Andhra Pradesh.
The construction industry's dependence on ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and natural aggregates is a major contributor to global CO₂ emissions and natural-resource depletion, motivating the increasing use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) such as fly ash, ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), silica fume, and metakaolin, together with recycled aggregate (RA) derived from construction and demolition waste. However, incorporating SCMs and RA introduces significant variability and non-linearity into the strength-development behaviour of concrete, which classical mix-design equations and regression models struggle to capture reliably. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques — including artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), decision trees, ensemble methods (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, AdaBoost, Bagging), gene expression programming (GEP), and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) — have emerged as powerful data-driven alternatives capable of learning these complex mix-property relationships directly from experimental data. This review synthesizes 28 peer-reviewed studies published between 1998 and 2026 that apply ML/AI methods to predict the compressive strength of concrete containing SCMs, recycled aggregates, or both. The review compares model architectures, dataset characteristics, input parameters, and reported performance metrics (R², RMSE, MAE), and synthesizes the influencing parameters identified through sensitivity and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analyses across the literature. Ensemble tree-based methods, particularly Random Forest, XGBoost, and CatBoost, are found to consistently outperform single learners across both SCM- and RA-based datasets, with reported R² values ranging from 0.79 to 0.99. The review identifies persistent gaps — limited standardization of input features, scarcity of studies combining SCMs and RA simultaneously with interpretable AI, and a shortage of externally validated, deployment-ready models — and outlines directions for future research, including federated multi-source databases, hybrid metaheuristic-optimized models, and explainable AI for sustainable mix-design optimization.
KEYWORDS
This review has synthesized 28 studies applying machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques to predict the compressive strength of concrete incorporating supplementary cementitious materials, recycled aggregate, or both. Ensemble tree-based methods — particularly Random Forest, XGBoost, and CatBoost — consistently outperform individual learners such as single decision trees, with reported R² values spanning 0.79–0.92 for SCM-concrete studies built on the widely used 1,030-record benchmark dataset, and 0.842–0.987 for RAC studies built on more heterogeneous, non-standardized datasets. Curing age, binder content, water-to-binder ratio, RA replacement ratio, and — where available — SCM chemical-oxide composition emerge as the most consistently influential parameters across sensitivity and SHAP analyses. Studies addressing SCMs and recycled aggregate simultaneously remain comparatively scarce and report somewhat lower and more variable accuracy than single-variable studies, reflecting smaller, more heterogeneous datasets. Future progress in this domain will depend on the development of standardized, richly featured benchmark datasets for RAC and combined SCM–RA concrete; wider adoption of model-interpretability tools; continued development of hybrid, metaheuristic-optimized ensembles; multi-objective frameworks that jointly optimize strength and sustainability; and, critically, prospective external validation that moves ML-based strength prediction from a research demonstration toward a field-deployable design tool for sustainable concrete.
Abduljaleel, Y. W., Al-Obaidi, B., Khattab, M. M., Usman, F., Syamsir, A., & Albaker, B. M. (2024). Compressive strength prediction of recycled aggregate concrete based on different machine learning algorithms. Al-Iraqia Journal for Scientific Engineering Research, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.58564/IJSER.3.3.2024.221 Ahmad, W., Ahmad, A., Ostrowski, K. A., Aslam, F., Joyklad, P., & Zajdel, P. (2021). Application of advanced machine learning approaches to predict the compressive strength of concrete containing supplementary cementitious materials. Materials, 14(19), 5762. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195762 Aslam, F., & Shahab, M. Z. (2024). Supplementary cementitious materials in blended cement concrete: Advancements in predicting compressive strength through machine learning. Materials Today Communications, 38, 107725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107725 Ben Chaabene, W., Flah, M., & Nehdi, M. L. (2020). Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties of concrete: Critical review. Construction and Building Materials, 260, 119889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119889 Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785–794). https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785 Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018 Ebid, A. M., Ulloa, N., Onyelowe, K. C., Zuñiga Rodriguez, M. G., Andrade Valle, A. I., & Zárate Villacres, A. N. (2024). Multiple AI predictive models for compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete. Cogent Engineering, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2024.2385621
Publication Date
9/28/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...