Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67048
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-8
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
11th standard student
Student of St. Xavier’s Senior Secondary school, Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, India
School of Engineering & Technology
Rungta International Skills University, Bhilai. Chhattisgarh, India
Assistant Professor and HOD (Economics)
BCS Govt. PG College, Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, Indiaa
In modern Indian society, the issue of stream selection and career discrimination has become a major socio-educational challenge. Academic streams such as Science, Commerce, and Humanities are often linked with social prestige, intelligence, and financial success, creating a hierarchical mindset among parents, students, and educational institutions. Science is generally regarded as the most prestigious stream, whereas Commerce and Humanities are frequently undervalued despite their important role in national development. These bias influences students’ career decisions and often compels them to choose socially accepted professions instead of careers based on their interests and abilities. This paper examines the sociological, psychological, and developmental aspects of stream-based discrimination in India. It explores how parental pressure, societal expectations, and comparison culture contribute to stress, anxiety, low confidence, and career dissatisfaction among students. The study highlights the equal importance of all streams in ensuring balanced national growth and emphasizes the need for educational reforms, career counselling, mental health awareness, and respect for every profession.
KEYWORDS
The present study concludes that stream selection in India is influenced not only by educational considerations but also by social prestige, parental expectations, and economic aspirations. The findings demonstrate that Science, Commerce, and Humanities are equally important for national development, contributing respectively to technological advancement, economic growth, governance, education, and social progress. However, persistent stream-based stereotypes often shape career choices, leading to educational inequality and psychological challenges among students. The study further highlights that career satisfaction and professional success are more closely associated with aptitude, interests, and motivation than with the perceived status of a particular stream. Excessive preference for one academic pathway may restrict educational diversity, reduce workforce adaptability, and hinder interdisciplinary innovation. Comparative evidence from developed countries indicates that balanced participation across academic disciplines strengthens human capital and sustainable development. Therefore, promoting aptitude-based career guidance, educational equity, and equal recognition of all academic streams is essential for enhancing student well-being, fostering innovation, and supporting long-term national progress. The central message emerging from this study remains clear: “A perfect stream for that individual can accelerate the growth of the country.”
1. Bourdieu, P. (2020). Forms of capital and social reproduction in education. Routledge. 2. Garcia, H., & Miralles, F. (2020). Ikigai: The Japanese secret to a long and happy life. Penguin Random House. 3. Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Education. 4. Government of India. (2023). The Constitution of India. Ministry of Law and Justice. 5. Haralambos, M., & Holborn, M. (2019). Sociology: Themes and perspectives (9th ed.). HarperCollins. 6. Kaur, A., et.al. (2023). Mental health related stigma, service provision and utilization in Northern India: Situational analysis. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 17(10). 7. Kumar, V. (2024). Educational choices and social expectations in contemporary India. Journal of Indian Education Studies, 18(4), 88–104. 8. Ministry of Education, Government of India. (2024). All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) 2021–22. Government of India. 9. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Career guidance for adults in a changing world of work. OECD Publishing. 10. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Education at a glance 2025. OECD Publishing.
Publication Date
8/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
7
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
9
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...