Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65848
Volume:
10 |
7 |
Jul 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women
Banks lose large amounts of money to fraud every year, yet the same privacy rules that protect customers also stop banks from comparing notes on how fraud happens. When one bank discovers a new fraud pattern, it usually has no way to warn other banks, because sharing raw transaction records is restricted by law and by competitive concerns. This paper presents a federated fraud detection system that lets several banks train one shared model together without any bank ever seeing another bank's data. Three simulated banks, modelled on Bank A, Bank B, and Bank C, each train a local neural network on their own transaction data and send only the trained weights to a central server. The server averages these weights using Federated Averaging to build a single global fraud model, which is then sent back to every bank. A simple web interface built with Streamlit lets a user enter a transaction and see, side by side, what the local bank model and the global model each predict. The results show that the global model can flag fraud patterns that a single bank's local model alone would have missed, while every bank keeps full control of its own data throughout. The system was implemented using PyTorch for model training and Flower for the federated learning pipeline.
KEYWORDS
· This paper presented a federated learning system that lets multiple banks work together to strengthen a shared fraud detection model while each bank keeps exclusive control of its own transaction data. By limiting all communication between banks to model parameters, and combining those parameters through Federated Averaging at a central server, the system lets fraud knowledge learned at one bank help detection at another bank, something a conventional, siloed fraud detection setup cannot do. · Built across three simulated bank nodes using PyTorch, Flower, and a Streamlit interface, the system trains reliably at the local level and produces a global model that genuinely reflects knowledge pooled from all three banks. The results support the central claim of this project: banks do not have to choose between protecting customer privacy and detecting fraud effectively. Extending the system with differential privacy, secure aggregation, and explainability, as outlined in Section VII, would move it closer to something a real bank could deploy.
[1] Y. Tang and Z. Liu, "A Credit Card Fraud Detection Algorithm Based on SDT and Federated Learning," IEEE Access, 2024. [2] P. Gawade, J. Hande, and P. Kene, "Federated Learning in Banking: A Secure and Intelligent Approach to Financial Fraud Detection," Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), June 2025. [3] A. A. Ahmed and O. O. Alabi, "Secure and Scalable Blockchain-Based Federated Learning for Cryptocurrency Fraud Detection: A Systematic Review," IEEE Access, July 2024. [4] T. El Hallal and Y. El Mourabit, "Federated Learning for Credit Card Fraud Detection: Key Fundamentals and Emerging Trends," IEEE, June 2024. [5] S. K. Aljunaid, S. J. Almheiri, H. Dawood, and M. A. Khan, "Secure and Transparent Banking: Explainable AI-Driven Federated Learning Model for Financial Fraud Detection," Journal of Risk and Financial Management, March 2025. [6] W. Zheng, L. Yan, C. Gou, and F.-Y. Wang, "Federated Meta-Learning for Fraudulent Credit Card Detection," IJCAI, 2019. [7] C. H. Kennedy, A. Hilal, and M. Momeni, "The Role of Federated Learning in Improving Financial Security: A Survey," IEEE, October 2025. [8] N. Abid, "Improving Accuracy and Efficiency of Online Payment Fraud Detection and Prevention with Machine Learning Models," International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, December 2025. [9] A. R. Gudimetla, "Decentralized Fraud Detection: Advancing Payment Security Through Federated Learning," IJITMIS, January 2025. [10] M. S. Islam and N. Rahman, "AI-Driven Fraud Detections in Financial Institutions: A Comprehensive Study," Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, January 2025.
Publication Date
7/6/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...