Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64789
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

School of Computer applications and technology
Galgotias University
School of Computer applications and technology
Galgotias University
School of Computer applications and technology
Galgotias University
School of Computer applications and technology
Galgotias University
This paper presents a sentiment analysis system we developed — RSR Analyze — that can classify product reviews as positive, negative, or neutral in real time. What makes our approach different from most existing work is that we deliberately avoided heavy transformer-based models like BERT, and instead focused on building something that is lightweight, fast, and practical to deploy. We trained our system on a large-scale Amazon review dataset and also incorporated Hinglish and code-mixed language support, since that is how a lot of real Indian users actually write reviews online. Through multiple experiments, we compared traditional models (Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, LinearSVC) with deep learning approaches (LSTM, BERT, DistilBERT) across accuracy, F1-score, inference latency, and memory usage. Our results show that LinearSVC with TF-IDF features achieves around 88% accuracy while being significantly faster and lighter than transformer models — making it genuinely usable for real-time applications.
KEYWORDS
This project started from a simple observation: most of the best NLP models in research are not actually usable by most real-world systems. Our goal was to close that gap — at least partially — by building a system that is accurate enough to be useful, fast enough to be practical, and flexible enough to handle the kind of messy multilingual text that real Indian users produce every day. RSR Analyze demonstrates that traditional ML models, when combined with thoughtful preprocessing and feature engineering, can still be highly competitive. LinearSVC with TF-IDF + Bigram features achieves 88% accuracy at under 5ms per inference — a combination that transformers simply cannot match at that compute level. The multilingual evaluation results also show that handling Hinglish is genuinely feasible without a heavy multilingual model, provided the preprocessing is done right. We see this as meaningful progress toward making sentiment analysis tools accessible for Indian-language e-commerce platforms. That said, we are aware of the trade-offs. Deep context understanding, sarcasm detection, and aspect-level sentiment analysis remain open challenges. Our future work will explore hybrid architectures — combining a fast TF-IDF backbone with lightweight contextual modules — to see if we can push accuracy higher without sacrificing the efficiency that makes this system practical. As a final thought: building this project gave us hands-on experience with the full ML pipeline, from raw data to a deployed API. That practical experience was, in many ways, the most valuable outcome.
[1] Pang, B., Lee, L., & Vaithyanathan, S. (2002). Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. Proceedings of EMNLP 2002, 79–86. [2] Joshi, A., Prabhu, A., Shrivastava, M., & Varma, V. (2016). Towards sub-word level compositions for sentiment analysis of Hindi-English code mixed data. Proceedings of COLING 2016, 2482–2491. [3] Yadav, S., Chakravarthi, B. R., Bansal, P., & Kumar, V. (2020). Sentiment analysis of Hindi-English code mixed data. Proceedings of the Workshop on Tools & Resources to Empower People with Reading Difficulties (READ), 37–44. [4] Pedregosa, F., et al. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830. [5] Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2019, 4171–4186.
Publication Date
6/11/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...