Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM52248
Volume:
9 |
8 |
Aug 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This paper explores the transformative role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in automating due diligence processes within defense lending, a critical area where financial institutions provide credit to defense-related companies. Due diligence, traditionally a labor-intensive process, can be significantly enhanced by AI, leading to faster, more accurate, and cost-efficient assessments of financial, operational, and legal risks. AI’s ability to process vast amounts of data, predict trends, and enhance risk management, fraud detection, and regulatory compliance makes it invaluable in defense lending, where the stakes are exceptionally high due to geopolitical uncertainties and security concerns. The study aims to examine AI’s impact on decision-making efficiency, cost reduction, and compliance in defense lending, while also addressing the ethical concerns, limitations, and challenges of AI implementation. A review of existing literature reveals that while AI improves risk prediction and operational efficiency, challenges related to transparency, bias, and cyber security remain. The findings suggest that explicability and fairness should be tailored to specific applications to enhance trust and accountability. The paper concludes by offering insights into how AI can be effectively integrated into defense lending through robust governance frameworks and a combination of AI techniques to enhance risk management. Future research directions include hybrid AI models, cognitive algorithms, and the implications of AI on global security dynamics, emphasizing the need for a legal framework to ensure responsible AI use.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
8/28/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
8
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...