Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM30872
Volume:
8 |
4 |
Apr 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The paper investigates the psychological factors influencing investors’ decision-making processes, with a particular focus on how biases affect risk tolerance and investment decisions. Utilizing a comprehensive methodology that includes ANOVA, regression, and correlational analysis, this study examines the effects of biases such as overconfidence, anchoring, herd behaviour, regret aversion and optimism biases on investment decisions. The research findings reveal significant correlations between these psychological biases and investor behaviour, highlighting their impact on risk assessment and decision-making strategies. To ensure the reliability of the research tools, a Cronbach’s Alpha test was conducted, confirming the consistency of the instruments used. The study’s results challenge the traditional notion that states that investment decisions are driven solely by logical reasoning and underscoring the substantial influence of emotional and cognitive biases. These insights contribute to the field of behavioural finance by enhancing understanding of the psychological underpinnings in investment decision-making and suggesting practical applications for financial education and advisory services. The paper advocates for the inclusion of psychological bias recognition in investor education, proposing that such an approach can significantly improve decision-making and lead to better investment outcomes. The implications of this research extend beyond individual investors to financial advisors and policymakers, offering them a foundation to develop strategies and regulations that help mitigate bias-driven investment mistakes, ultimately fostering greater financial well-being and market efficiency.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45397
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...