Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM51486
Volume:
9 |
7 |
Jul 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In the digital age of education, ensuring the originality and integrity of question banks is a pressing challenge, especially with the widespread reuse and paraphrasing of content. Manual plagiarism detection methods are inefficient at scale and often fail to identify semantically similar or reworded questions. This paper presents an AI-Based Question Bank Plagiarism Checker Module that leverages advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to detect duplicated and paraphrased academic questions. The system utilizes transformer-based sentence embedding models such as Sentence-BERT and SimCSE to convert textual content into semantic vectors. Cosine similarity metrics are then applied to determine the degree of similarity between questions. The platform supports uploads in PDF, DOCX, and TXT formats and includes metadata classification (subject, grade, board, question type). A React-based frontend combined with a Node.js backend enables real-time detection, file-to-file comparison, and automated report generation. Administrators have access to dashboards for user activity tracking, file history management, and system insights. By automating semantic-level plagiarism detection, the system significantly improves academic content quality and supports fair assessment practices.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/21/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...