Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65605
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Computer Science and engineering
RMDSTIC
Department of Computer Science and engineering
RMDSTIC
Department of Computer Science and engineering
RMDSTIC
Department of Computer Science and engineering
RMDSTIC
Department of Computer Science and engineering
RMDSTIC
The rising level of human-wildlife conflict and the desperate necessity to preserve biodiversity have established high demand of intelligent, automated wildlife monitoring systems. This review assesses recent developments in artificial intelligence used in ecological informatics, and its application in the integration of computer vision, bioacoustics, Internet of Things (IoT), and edge computing technologies. The relevant literature on animal detection by images, automation of camera traps, species recognition, sound-based recognition, intrusion warning systems, and low-power deployment devices were examined. Popular ones are YOLO, convolutional neural networks, EfficientNet, transfer learning, Wav2Vec2 transformers, and sensor-based alert systems. Some studies have reported detection rates of more than 90 percent and the lightweight models have enhanced speed, less memory and can be deployed in remote environments. The results indicate that visual deep learning models are highly accurate in detecting, counting, and identifying species under controlled environments but fail to work effectively in nocturnal scenes, camouflage, occlusion, dense vegetation, and so on. Conversely, hybrid systems that integrate image data, acoustic sensing as well as real-time alerts contribute significantly to detection reliability. Audio models based on transformers, and few-shot learning methods, also demonstrate good potential in recognizing rare species with sparse information. This review suggests that multimodal sensor fusion, predictive analytics, and energy efficient edge processing should be the focus of future systems to enable sustainable wildlife monitoring.
KEYWORDS
Recent advancements in the field of artificial intelligence-based wildlife monitoring systems, based on image-based detection, bioacoustic analysis, IoT-enabled alert system, and energy efficient edge deployment, were discussed in this review. The findings demonstrate that deep learning models, specifically CNN and YOLO, are very accurate on visual detection tasks, but transformer-based models, such as Wav2Vec2, were much better on acoustic recognition. The approach of transfer learning also allows recognizing a particular animal in detail, which demonstrates that it is possible to conduct in-depth ecological monitoring. Despite these advancements, none of the detection modalities can be applied to consistently achieve good results in all environmental conditions. Visual systems are influenced by lighting, occlusion and camouflage, and acoustic systems are influenced by environmental noise and redundant signals. Multimodal methods, which are based on visual, acoustic and sensor-based information, have proven to be the most effective approach in improving reliability and robustness in real life scenarios. System design by energy-efficient design, especially through edge computing and motion-based filtering techniques is a key focus enabling long term deployment in remote environments. These strategies reduce the amount of computation required, and dramatically extend the operational life, allowing large-scale monitoring to become more feasible. Overall, the field of wildlife monitoring has been revolutionized by artificial intelligence through offering automated, real-time and scalable solutions. Multi-modal integration, model design and affordability deployment strategies should be prioritized in the future to facilitate sustainable conservation measures and eliminate human-wildlife conflicts.
1. Norouzzadeh, M.S.; Nguyen, A.; Kosmala, M.; Swanson, A.; Palmer, M.S.; Packer, C.; Clune, J. Automatically identifying, counting, and describing wild animals in camera-trap images with deep learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E5716–E5725. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719367115 2. Premarathna, K.S.P.; Rathnayaka, R.M.K.T.; Charles, J. To solve the issue of human-elephant conflict and to track the movements of an elephant with the help of deep learning, an elephant detection system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS), Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITR51448.2020.9310798 3. Sato, R.; Saito, H.; Tomioka, Y.; Kohira, Y.The energy reduction method in detecting devices of wild animals. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 24149–24160. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3155242 4. Redmon, J.; Farhadi, A. YOLOv3: A slight improvement. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1804.02767. 5. Jocher, G.; Chaurasia, A.; Qiu, J. YOLOv5 by Ultralytics. Available online: https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5 (accessed on 10 April 2026). Jocher, G.; Qiu, J.; Chaurasia, A. YOLOv8: Ultralytics next-generation object detection model. Available online: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics (accessed on 10 April 2026). 6. Tan, M.; Le, Q. EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. This can be found in Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Long Beach, CA, USA, 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.11946 7. Baevski, A.; Zhou, H.; Mohamed, A.; Auli, M. Wav2Vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech representations. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Vancouver, Canada, 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.11477 8. Chollet, F. Deep learning with Python; Manning Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2017. 10. 9. He, K.; Zhang, X.; Ren, S.; Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Published in proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 10. Very convolutional networks, very large-scale image recognition. Simonyan, K.; Zisserman, A. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1409.1556.
Publication Date
6/28/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...