Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM54075
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The web platform has undergone rapid evolution from 2023–2025 across rendering models, runtime tooling, browser capabilities, and deployment targets. This paper surveys recent innovations—including React Server Components (RSC) and hybrid rendering in Next.js; Svelte 5 “runes”; islands/resumability architectures (Astro, Qwik); the resurgence of web‑native approaches (Web Components, htmx); advances in execution (WebAssembly, WebGPU); and the rise of edge/serverless runtimes (Cloudflare Workers, Deno, Bun). We propose a methodology for comparative analysis based on user‑centric performance (CWV), developer productivity, portability, and operational cost. Using a synthetic benchmark suite and a review of peer‑reviewed and industry sources, we compare representative technologies: Next.js (App Router + RSC), Svelte 5/SvelteKit, Astro (Islands), Qwik (Resumability), and a Web Components + htmx stack. Results indicate that hybrid rendering and disappearing‑framework paradigms substantially reduce client‑side JavaScript while maintaining interactivity, improving Core Web Vitals on constrained networks. We discuss trade‑offs in complexity, ecosystem maturity, accessibility, and vendor lock‑in, and outline research and practice implications.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/18/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...