Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM64354

Recent Trends in Edge Detection: Comparative Analysis of Classical Operators and Modern Vision Techniques

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM64354

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1-8

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM64354

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Dr.K.Saraswathi

Dr.K.Saraswathi

Department of General Engineering

Annai Mathammal Sheela Engineering College

Download Author Certificate
M. Shanmugapriyan

M. Shanmugapriyan

Department of Computer Science

Nehru Memorial College

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Edge detection remains a cornerstone of digital image processing, enabling accurate feature extraction and object recognition across diverse applications. Classical operators such as Roberts, Prewitt, and Sobel laid the foundation by employing gradient-based techniques, while second-order approaches like the Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) and Difference of Gaussians (DoG) enhanced sensitivity to fine details[1]. However, these methods often struggle with noise and edge continuity. Recent advancements, particularly the Canny detector, Deriche filter, and SUSAN algorithm, have introduced hybrid strategies that balance precision, robustness, and computational efficiency[2]. Contemporary research trends further integrate edge detection with machine learning and deep vision frameworks, enabling adaptive, context-aware analysis in fields such as medical imaging, autonomous navigation, and intelligent surveillance[3]. This paper presents a comparative study of classical and modern edge detection techniques, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and evolving relevance. The analysis underscores the transition from traditional operators to advanced vision-driven approaches shaping next-generation image analytics.

KEYWORDS

Edge Detection Image Processing Gradient-Based Operators Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) Canny Edge Detector Computer Vision Recent Trends in Image Analytic

Cite This Article

Dr.K.Saraswathi, M. Shanmugapriyan, "Recent Trends in Edge Detection: Comparative Analysis of Classical Operators and Modern Vision Techniques," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-8, May 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM64354

Full Article/Conclusion

This study highlights the progression from classical edge detection operators to modern vision-driven techniques. Classical methods such as Roberts, Prewitt, and Sobel provide simple baselines but suffer from noise sensitivity and fragmented edges. Second-order approaches like LoG and DoG improve detail detection yet remain prone to false edges. Modern algorithms—Canny, Deriche, and SUSAN—deliver superior accuracy, robustness, and edge continuity, making them more effective for complex and real-time applications. Among these, the Canny edge detector emerges as the best-performing method, consistently achieving the highest accuracy and producing thin, continuous edges with strong noise suppression [2]. Overall, the transition toward hybrid and AI-integrated approaches underscores their growing relevance in medical imaging, biometric identification, autonomous navigation, and next-generation computer vision systems [3][6].

References

1.    Wang, L., Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2020). Comparative study of classical and modern edge detection algorithms in digital image processing. Journal of Visual Communication and ImageRepresentation,71,102844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2020.102844 2.    Singh, R., & Kumar, A. (2021). Performance evaluation of edge detection techniques for medical image segmentation. Biomedical Signal Processing andControl,68,102703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102703 3.    Zhao, M., Chen, X., & Xu, Y. (2022). Deep learning-based hybrid edge detection for autonomous navigation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(12), 23456–23467. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2022.3145678 4.    Ahmed, S., & Rahman, M. (2023). Robust edge detection under varying illumination using SUSAN and adaptive thresholding. Pattern Recognition Letters,165,45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2023.02.005 5.    Li, Q., & Zhou, J. (2024). Real-time edge detection using Deriche filters in embedded vision systems. Sensors,24(7),3124. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24073124 6.    Chen, Y., & Wang, J. (2025). Context-aware edge detection with deep vision frameworks: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(4), 2891–2915. 7.     Huang, Y., Liu, Z., & Chen, H. (2020). Edge detection techniques: A comparative review of classical operators and modern approaches. Information Sciences, 512,36–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.09.015 8.    Patel, R., & Mehta, K. (2021). Evaluation of Canny and Deriche edge detectors for real-time medical imaging applications. Biomedical Engineering Letters, 11(2), 145–153.             https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-021-00179-4 9.    Gao, J., Wang, L., & Xu, P. (2023). SUSAN-based adaptive edge detection under varying illumination     conditions. Pattern Recognition Letters, 165, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2023.02.010 10. Sharma, A., & Verma, S. (2024). Deep learning integrated edge detection: Bridging classical operators with modern vision frameworks. Applied Intelligence, 54(6), 7890–7905.             https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-024-03789-2

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/31/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

6

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...