Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67763

ReFlow: Agentic AI-Based Self-Healing Data Pipeline for Data Quality Monitoring and Automated Recovery

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67763

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-7

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67763

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Ganesh Roddanavar

Ganesh Roddanavar

Department of Data Engineering

GM University Davanagere

Download Author Certificate
DNS

DR. Neelambike S

Department of Data Engineering

GM University Davanagere

Download Co-Author Certificate
NNM

Niveditha N M

Department of Data Engineering

GM University Davanagere

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Data-quality errors and processing failures can interrupt data pipelines and increase the effort required for manual troubleshooting. This paper proposes an agentic AI-based self-healing framework for monitoring structured batch data and coordinating controlled recovery. The framework combines rule-based validation with large language model assistance to interpret detected issues and recommend corrective actions. Python and pandas support data processing, while Gemini assists diagnosis using relevant schema information and error logs. A recovery controller checks each recommendation, executes an approved repair function, and revalidates the output before allowing processing to continue. Original inputs and incident histories are retained for traceability, and ambiguous or unresolved cases are referred for human review. A Streamlit dashboard displays validation findings, recovery attempts, and before-and-after data comparisons. The proposed evaluation introduces known defects into synthetic datasets and compares the framework with rule-based cleaning and retry-only recovery on their applicable tasks. Evaluation measures include detection performance, correction precision, repair coverage, recovery success, processing time, and unintended changes. Comparative experiments remain pending; the paper presents the proposed framework and evaluation design without claiming measured improvements.

KEYWORDS

Agentic AI Data Quality Self-Healing Pipelines Automated Recovery Large Language Models Data Engineering.

Cite This Article

Ganesh Roddanavar, DR. Neelambike S, Niveditha N M, "ReFlow: Agentic AI-Based Self-Healing Data Pipeline for Data Quality Monitoring and Automated Recovery," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-7, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67763

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper presents ReFlow, a proposed agentic AI-based self-healing data pipeline for data-quality monitoring and controlled recovery. The framework combines rule-based validation, Gemini-assisted diagnosis, approved repair functions, and independent revalidation. It focuses on structured Amazon product data, including missing values, inconsistent numeric formats, invalid prices, ratings, and duplicate candidates. The design preserves original records and maintains an incident history to make corrections traceable. Uncertain recommendations and unresolved issues are referred for human review. A Streamlit interface supports data upload, inspection of repairs, and comparison of original and processed datasets. The main contribution is a coordinated workflow that connects error detection with diagnosis, correction, and verification. Comparative evaluation remains pending; therefore, improvements in repair correctness, recovery time, or manual effort cannot yet be confirmed. Future work will evaluate these outcomes against a rule-based baseline and explore additional data sources, database integration, and streaming support.

References

[6] N. Sambasivan et al., “‘Everyone Wants to Do the Model Work, Not the Data Work’: Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI,” in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2021. DOI[7] Y. Tashiro, J. Song, Y. Song, and S. Ermon, “CSDI: Conditional Score-based Diffusion Models for Probabilistic Time Series Imputation,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2021. Paper[8] J. Xu, H. Wu, J. Wang, and M. Long, “Anomaly Transformer: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Association Discrepancy,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2022. Paper[9] J. Wei et al., “Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2022. Paper[10] S. Yao et al., “ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023. Paper[11] N. Shinn et al., “Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023. Paper[12] A. Madaan et al., “Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023. Paper[13] T. Schick et al., “Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023. Paper[14] X. Wang et al., “Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023. Paper

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/9/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

7

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...