Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67763
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Data Engineering
GM University Davanagere
Department of Data Engineering
GM University Davanagere
Department of Data Engineering
GM University Davanagere
Data-quality errors and processing failures can interrupt data pipelines and increase the effort required for manual troubleshooting. This paper proposes an agentic AI-based self-healing framework for monitoring structured batch data and coordinating controlled recovery. The framework combines rule-based validation with large language model assistance to interpret detected issues and recommend corrective actions. Python and pandas support data processing, while Gemini assists diagnosis using relevant schema information and error logs. A recovery controller checks each recommendation, executes an approved repair function, and revalidates the output before allowing processing to continue. Original inputs and incident histories are retained for traceability, and ambiguous or unresolved cases are referred for human review. A Streamlit dashboard displays validation findings, recovery attempts, and before-and-after data comparisons. The proposed evaluation introduces known defects into synthetic datasets and compares the framework with rule-based cleaning and retry-only recovery on their applicable tasks. Evaluation measures include detection performance, correction precision, repair coverage, recovery success, processing time, and unintended changes. Comparative experiments remain pending; the paper presents the proposed framework and evaluation design without claiming measured improvements.
KEYWORDS
This paper presents ReFlow, a proposed agentic AI-based self-healing data pipeline for data-quality monitoring and controlled recovery. The framework combines rule-based validation, Gemini-assisted diagnosis, approved repair functions, and independent revalidation. It focuses on structured Amazon product data, including missing values, inconsistent numeric formats, invalid prices, ratings, and duplicate candidates. The design preserves original records and maintains an incident history to make corrections traceable. Uncertain recommendations and unresolved issues are referred for human review. A Streamlit interface supports data upload, inspection of repairs, and comparison of original and processed datasets. The main contribution is a coordinated workflow that connects error detection with diagnosis, correction, and verification. Comparative evaluation remains pending; therefore, improvements in repair correctness, recovery time, or manual effort cannot yet be confirmed. Future work will evaluate these outcomes against a rule-based baseline and explore additional data sources, database integration, and streaming support.
[6] N. Sambasivan et al., “‘Everyone Wants to Do the Model Work, Not the Data Work’: Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI,” in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2021. DOI[7] Y. Tashiro, J. Song, Y. Song, and S. Ermon, “CSDI: Conditional Score-based Diffusion Models for Probabilistic Time Series Imputation,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2021. Paper[8] J. Xu, H. Wu, J. Wang, and M. Long, “Anomaly Transformer: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Association Discrepancy,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2022. Paper[9] J. Wei et al., “Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2022. Paper[10] S. Yao et al., “ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023. Paper[11] N. Shinn et al., “Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023. Paper[12] A. Madaan et al., “Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023. Paper[13] T. Schick et al., “Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023. Paper[14] X. Wang et al., “Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023. Paper
Publication Date
10/9/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...