Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM41942
Volume:
9 |
3 |
Mar 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go offers a poignant dystopian narrative that reconceptualizes the human body as a focal point of biomedical innovation and ethical debate. Set in a society where clones are produced exclusively for organ donation, the novel explores the moral complexities that include medical progress and its effects on identity, autonomy, and the essence of humanity. This paper investigates the ethical implications of the narrative through the lens of medical humanities, emphasizing the transplanting of the organs of the body and the dehumanizing repercussions of utilitarian bioethics. The analysis delves into the character’s real experiences, interpersonal connections, and internal conflicts and reveals the integration between scientific advancement and personal dignity. Ishiguro’s intricate depiction of the clones’ resignation to their destinies prompts essential inquiries regarding consent, exploitation, and the societal frameworks that render ethical violations acceptable. By examining the narrative’s relationship with bioethical theories, this paper highlights the novel’s significance in current discussions surrounding cloning, organ transplantation, and the ethical limits of life sciences. To conclude, this research posits that Never Let Me Go functions as a cautionary narrative, compelling readers to contemplate the ramifications of unregulated biomedical advancements and the ethical obligations they impose. The study illustrates how literature serves as a distinctive medium to critique the socio-political aspects of medicine, underscoring the necessity of preserving humanity and compassion amid scientific progress.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
1/2/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...