Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM41882
Volume:
9 |
2 |
Feb 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The growing need for sustainable and economically viable construction materials has prompted researchers to seek alternative aggregates in reinforced cement concrete (RCC). This research looks into the potential of using coconut shells as an alternative to conventional coarse aggregates in the manufacture of RCC marking poles. Coconut shells are lightweight, long-lasting, and readily available agricultural waste materials that present a viable alternative to minimize environmental effects and ensure sustainable construction. The study incorporates a comparative assessment of RCC marking poles constructed from normal aggregates versus partially or wholly replaced aggregates utilizing coconut shells. Different parameters of compressive strength, durability, and cost effectiveness are determined under laboratory tests. The outcomes conclude that coconut shell aggregate demonstrates an adequate level of strength for non-structural work such as marking poles without causing any hike in overall material expense and promoting greener materialization. The current research concludes that coconut shell RCC marking poles have the potential to act as an innovative and environmentally friendly solution to promoting waste usage and resource optimization in the building construction sector.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/26/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...