Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM62376

Repositioning in the Digital Age: Assessing Consumer Perceptions of SHEIN India’s Brand Equity Following Its 2025 Make in India Relaunch

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM62376

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1--

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

KK

Krishna Khurad

Master of design space

National Institute of Fashion Technology, Bengaluru

Download Author Certificate
SG

Sneha Gupta

Master of design space

National Institute of Fashion Technology, Bengaluru

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

PPCK

Prof. Prashanth Cherian Kochuveetil

Master of design space

National Institute of Fashion Technology, Bengaluru

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

This study examines consumer perceptions of brand equity following the 2025 relaunch of SHEIN India through a domestic manufacturing partnership with Reliance Retail. The brand’s reentry into the Indian market, after its suspension due to border tensions, represents a deliberate repositioning effort warranting empirical investigation. Drawing on the consumer based brand equity (CBBE) framework developed by Yoo and Donthu (2001) and signalling theory (Spence, 1973), seven brand equity dimensions are measured: Repositioning Perception, Brand Awareness, Perceived Quality, Brand Association, Brand Preference, Brand Trust, and Purchase Intent. A structured online questionnaire comprising 24 Likert scale items was administered to 38 urban Indian consumers with awareness of SHEIN. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alpha reliability analysis, Pearson correlation, independent samples t tests, one way ANOVA, chi square tests, and simple linear regression were employed. Results indicate that consumer brand equity perceptions are marginally positive across all dimensions (overall M = 3.14 on a 5 point scale), with Brand Trust emerging as the strongest predictor of Purchase Intent (R² = 0.740, p < .001). Brand Association scored lowest (M = 2.87), reflecting persistent data privacy concerns. Chi square analysis revealed that repositioning communications disproportionately reach prior users rather than new segments (χ² = 15.69, p = .016). The findings suggest that while structural repositioning signals have generated cautious positive perceptions, deeply embedded negative associations require sustained communication strategies to overcome. This study contributes to the CBBE literature on geopolitically motivated brand reentry in emerging markets.

KEYWORDS

Keywords: equity CBBE repositioning SHEIN signalling manufacturing trust

Cite This Article

Krishna Khurad, Sneha Gupta, Prof. Prashanth Cherian Kochuveetil, "Repositioning in the Digital Age: Assessing Consumer Perceptions of SHEIN India’s Brand Equity Following Its 2025 Make in India Relaunch," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1--, May 2026.

Full Article/Conclusion

This study set out to assess consumer perceptions of SHEIN India’s brand equity following its 2025 Make in India relaunch in partnership with Reliance Retail. Using the consumer based brand equity (CBBE) framework developed by Yoo and Donthu (2001), extended with Repositioning Perception, Brand Trust, and Brand Preference dimensions, and interpreted through signalling theory (Spence, 1973), the study measured seven brand equity dimensions among 38 urban Indian consumers. The findings demonstrate that SHEIN India’s structural repositioning has generated marginally positive brand equity perceptions across all seven dimensions, with an overall Brand Equity Index of M = 3.14. Brand Trust emerged as the strongest predictor of Purchase Intent (R² = 0.740), underscoring its centrality in the post repositioning context. However, Brand Association remains the most resistant dimension (M = 2.87), indicating that deeply encoded negative associations related to data privacy persist despite the structural changes. The chi square analysis further revealed that repositioning communications are predominantly reaching prior users rather than new consumer segments, highlighting a significant gap in the current communication strategy. The study contributes to the brand equity literature by extending the CBBE framework to the underexplored context of geopolitically motivated brand reentry in emerging markets and by providing empirical evidence for the application of signalling theory to brand repositioning. For practitioners, the results emphasise the importance of prioritising verifiable trust signals, directly addressing legacy negative associations, and expanding communication reach beyond the existing consumer base. As SHEIN India’s repositioning matures, longitudinal research with larger and more representative samples will be essential to track the evolution of consumer brand equity perceptions over time.

References

Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. Free Press. Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building strong brands. Free Press. Aaker, D. A., & Joachimsthaler, E. (2000). Brand leadership. Free Press. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press. Batra, R., Ramaswamy, V., Alden, D. L., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Ramachander, S. (2000). Effects of brand local and nonlocal origin on consumer attitudes in developing countries. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(2), 83 to 95. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP0902_3 Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81 to 93. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255 Cobb-Walgren, C. J., Ruble, C. A., & Donthu, N. (1995). Brand equity, brand preference, and purchase intent. Journal of Advertising, 24(3), 25 to 40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1995.10673481 Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organisation reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163 to 176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049 Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297 to 334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 Dacin, P. A., & Smith, D. C. (1994). The effect of brand portfolio characteristics on consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 229 to 242. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379403100207 Delgado-Ballester, E., & Munuera-Aleman, J. L. (2001). Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 35(11/12), 1238 to 1258. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006475 Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (1998). Brand equity as a signalling phenomenon. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 131 to 157. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_02 Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/3/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

3

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

8

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...