Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67883

RETHINKING CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE DIGITAL AGE Digital Rights, Technology and Global Internet Governance

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67883

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-10

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67883

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

AT

Aditya Tripathi

LLM (IP)

AMITY LAW SCHOOL

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

The expansion of artificial intelligence, algorithmic decision-making, biometric surveillance, social-media platforms and digital infrastructure has altered the location and exercise of constitutional power. Classical constitutionalism was principally designed to restrain the State through the rule of law, separation of powers, fundamental rights and judicial review. In the digital environment, however, power is increasingly exercised through data systems, algorithms and private platforms as well as traditional public institutions. This paper examines whether classical constitutionalism can adequately respond to these developments or whether a complementary framework of digital constitutionalism is required. It studies privacy, freedom of expression, equality, Internet shutdowns, AI surveillance, platform power and global Internet governance, with particular reference to India. Contemporary examples include the 2026 Jantar Mantar student protests and reported use of AI-assisted facial recognition and targeted Internet restrictions, the 2024 Manipur student protests and Internet suspension, and the 2026 Jharkhand student movement concerning alleged recruitment-examination irregularities. Comparative reference is made to the European Union and United States. The paper argues that digital constitutionalism should not displace classical constitutionalism; rather, it should extend constitutional principles of legality, proportionality, transparency, accountability, equality, privacy, due process and human oversight to digital spaces and technologically mediated public and private power.1

KEYWORDS

privacy freedom of expression equality Internet shutdowns AI surveillance

Cite This Article

Aditya Tripathi, "RETHINKING CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE DIGITAL AGE Digital Rights, Technology and Global Internet Governance," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-10, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67883

Full Article/Conclusion

The digital transformation has not abolished the classical principles of constitutionalism; it has exposed the need to apply them in new circumstances. Rule of law, dignity, equality, liberty, privacy, freedom of expression, proportionality and judicial review remain the foundation.63 The research supports the hypothesis that classical constitutionalism alone is not institutionally sufficient for the digital age. New forms of technological and private power require additional rules concerning algorithms, data, surveillance and platform governance

References

Agarwal, Bina, A Field of One’s Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia (Cambridge University Press 1994). European Union, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation). European Union, Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 (Digital Services Act). European Union, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act). Jain, M.P., Indian Constitutional Law (8th edn., LexisNexis 2018). United Nations Internet Governance Forum, official reports and institutional materials. ICANN, official policy and institutional materials on Internet governance. Internet Society, reports and policy materials on Internet shutdowns and digital rights. Indian Express, contemporary reports concerning Jantar Mantar, Manipur and Jharkhand protests, 2024–2026. India Today, contemporary reports concerning Internet restrictions and Jharkhand recruitment protests, 2024–2026. Constitution of India, 1950. Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. Information Technology Act, 2000.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/14/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

2

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

8

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...