Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67983

Revenue Growth and Governance Practices: A Case Study

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67983

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-6

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67983

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

MAH

Murtaza Ali Haidary

Mangement

Lovely professional university

Download Author Certificate
SS

Sonu Saha

Mangement

Lovely professional university

Download Co-Author Certificate
MA

Mohammed Anshif

Mangement

Lovely professional university

Download Co-Author Certificate
SM

Sreehari M

Mangement

Lovely professional university

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

DRB

Dr. Rohit Bansal

Mangement

Lovely professional university

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

This paper analyses Coforge Ltd’s financial performance and governance from FY2020–21 to FY2024–25. Using annual reports, investor disclosures and company policies it considers what the financial record reveals about growth and the oversight of management. Revenue in the historical series here increased from ₹4,662.8 crore to ₹12,050.7 crore across about 26.8% per annum across four intervals. Profits did not keep pace in FY25: on the figures in Table 1, net margin fell from approximately 8.8% in FY24 to 6.7% in FY25. As Coforge has dispersed ownership, the board’s scrutiny of executive decisions is particularly relevant. The structure of the board along with the policies that were published, set out formal safeguards. Though we must consider the fact that the public disclosures can’t portray how well those safeguards work in practice. Some questions are raised because of the lower margins, but it doesn’t any strong proof for a governance failure.

KEYWORDS

Coforge Ltd; corporate finance; agency theory; corporate governance; business ethics; financial ratios; Indian IT services

Cite This Article

Murtaza Ali Haidary, Sonu Saha, Mohammed Anshif, Sreehari M, Dr. Rohit Bansal, "Revenue Growth and Governance Practices: A Case Study," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-6, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67983

Full Article/Conclusion

Coforge shows why agency questions matter in a listed company without a controlling promoter: shareholders depend on disclosures, board oversight and institutional investors to assess management’s use of their capital. Between FY21 and FY25, revenue grew substantially, while the draft ratio series indicates low debt. Yet profit in FY25 barely increased against the displayed FY24 figure, and the shift to a continuing-operations presentation complicates that comparison. Coforge’s governance and ethics disclosures document arrangements that could support oversight. They do not demonstrate that those arrangements caused the financial results. The next step is to reconcile every year to a common reporting basis and follow the acquired businesses through integration, margins, cash flow and returns. Researchers could then examine specific board decisions and disclosures rather than drawing conclusions from titles and committee structures. A peer comparison would add context if the peer group and accounting definitions were chosen consistently. For now, the public record supports a narrower conclusion: shareholders have identifiable ways to monitor management, and the returns from acquisitions merit close attention.

References

Balasubramanian, N., Black, B. S., & Khanna, V. (2010). The relation between firm-level corporate governance and market value: A case study of India. Emerging Markets Review, 11(4), 319–340. Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Macmillan. Cadbury Committee. (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. Gee and Co. Coforge Ltd. (2025a). Annual report 2024–25. https://investors.coforge.com/annual-report Coforge Ltd. (2025). Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report FY 2024–25. https://investors.coforge.com/ Coforge Ltd. (2025). Code of conduct and ethics. https://investors.coforge.com/ Coforge Ltd. (2025). Corporate policies and governance reports. https://investors.coforge.com/ Coforge Ltd. (2025). Sustainability report FY 2024–25. https://esg.coforge.com/ Coforge Ltd. (2024). Coforge delivers robust 13.3% CC organic growth in FY24. https://news.coforge.com/newsroom/press-release/coforge-delivers-robust-13.3-cc-organic-growth-in-fy24-signs-a-tcv-400-mn-large-deal-in-q4-fy24 Coforge Ltd. (2025b). Coforge closes an exceptional FY25 with 32.0% CC growth. https://news.coforge.com/newsroom/press-release/coforge-closes-an-exceptional-fy25-with-32-cc-growth Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/14/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

5

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...