Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM23790
Volume:
7 |
6 |
Jun 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the effects of silica fume and metakaolin as partial replacements for cement in fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC). The use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) has gained significant attention in recent years as a means to enhance the mechanical and durability properties of concrete while reducing its environmental impact. Silica fume and metakaolin are two commonly used SCMs that have shown promising results in various concrete applications. The review begins by discussing the fundamental properties and characteristics of silica fume and metakaolin, including their pozzolanic reactivity and particle size distribution. Subsequently, the influence of incorporating these SCMs on the fresh and hardened properties of FRC is examined. The mechanical properties, such as compressive strength, tensile strength, and flexural strength, are evaluated in light of the varying replacement levels of silica fume and metakaolin. Additionally, the review addresses the durability aspects of FRC with silica fume and metakaolin, focusing on resistance to chloride ion penetration, carbonation, and alkali-silica reaction (ASR). The microstructural changes, hydration characteristics, and pore structure evolution of FRC mixes incorporating these SCMs are also discussed.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/19/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...