Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63858
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Computer Science
Malnad College of Engineering

Computer Science
Malnad College of Engineering

Computer Science
Malnad College of Engineering

Computer Science
Malnad College of Engineering

Computer Science
Malnad College of Engineering
The rapid growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) and Industrial Internet of Things (IoT) has increased cybersecurity challenges in modern networks. IoT environments consist of diverse and resource- constrained devices that continuously generate large amounts of network traffic. Due to weak security mechanisms and large-scale deployment, these systems are vulnerable to attacks such as zero-day attacks, distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, and advanced persistent threats. Traditional Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), including signature-based and machine learning-based approaches, have several limitations. Signature-based IDS cannot detect unknown attacks, while standalone machine learning methods struggle with high-dimensional data, class imbalance, and nonlinear attack behaviour. To overcome these issues, researchers have proposed hybrid AI-based IDS models combining deep learning, quantum computing, and swarm intelligence optimization techniques. This paper reviews recent studies using Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVM), transformer-based models, and optimization algorithms such as Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) and Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA), highlighting their advantages, limitations, and practical challenges.
KEYWORDS
One after another, the half-dozen studies pointed out weaknesses in classic intrusion detection when dealing with modern IoT needs. Faced with these shortfalls, researchers began exploring blends of artificial intelligence approaches. With quantum-inspired techniques entering the mix, collective intelligence models added extra strength. Detection rates climbed sharply - at the same time, false alerts grew far less frequent. What stayed clear was that older methods simply could not keep pace. Now deep learning stepped in, helping spot which bits of data were worth keeping. Only when everything connected did efficiency take a whole new form. Older setups falter, yet fresh designs handle hidden cyber risks better. Rather than copying outdated methods, certain programs blend quantum concepts with clever grouping strategies. Wolves hunting in packs inspire one method - sifting through tangled information early on. Drifting plankton guide another, adjusting focus where it counts. Patterns from nature let computers see routine actions versus real trouble with sharper eyes. Out of nowhere, small vision transformers - made lean by design - spot slight changes in how factory networks move data. Not their bulk that matters, rather the way they take in surroundings, much like someone watching quietly from the edge. Still, after gains made so far, certain hurdles refuse to fade. What catches attention most? A lot of quantum-based safety tech operates inside simulated settings instead of live quantum hardware. That gap means glitches found outside labs - like fading signals, noise from surroundings, or limits built into real gear - tend to slip through cracks. When those factors stay ignored, rolling out working versions feels uncertain, at minimum. Apart from that, quite a few of the reviewed studies stick to one dataset - NSL-KDD shows up most often - with only a handful using even two sources When models appear to pick up just certain patterns rather than catch breaches consistently, doubts start forming. Since performance can shift between setups, checking them on various data sets through uniform approaches helps reveal what they actually handle. Most heavy-duty number crunching trips up hybrid quantum-classical systems. Quick threat detection in connected gadgets? That needs pace - yet low-energy units lag behind. Still, plenty of today’s approaches ignore the sheer hassle of fitting them into actual environments. Consider QBCMVT: solid performance shows, but only if you accept its hunger for processing muscle - which blocks smooth operation on edge machines until models shrink down. Future research should focus on the following areas: • Development of lightweight hybrid IDS architectures for IoT edge devices • Validation of quantum-enhanced IDS models on real quantum hardware • Standardized cross-dataset benchmarking methodologies • Energy consumption and latency analysis for real- time deployment • Adaptive online intrusion detection systems capable of handling evolving attack patterns Overall, the reviewed studies establish a strong foundation for future research in hybrid AI-based intrusion detection systems. Although practical deployment challenges remain significant, the combination of quantum computing, swarm intelligence, and advanced deep learning architectures represents a promising direction for nextgeneration IoT and IoT cybersecurity solutions.
-[1] R. Kumar and M. Swarnkar, “QuIDS: A Quantum Support Vector Machine-Based Intrusion Detection System for IoT Networks,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 234, Art. no. 104072, Feb. 2025, doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2024.104072. [2] I. B. Bharathi, V. Sonai, and S. Sridevi, “QuantumDriven Enhanced Machine Learning Algorithm for Intrusion Detection in Internet of Things Environment,” EPJ Quantum Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, Art. no. 20, Jan. 2026, doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00463-5. [3] W. Chen et al., “Large-scale IoT Attack Detection Scheme Based on LightGBM and Improved Salp Swarm Algorithm,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, 2024. [4] E. I. Elsedimy et al., “A Novel Intrusion Detection System Based on Hybrid Quantum Support Vector Machine and Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer,” Cluster Computing, vol. 27, 2024. [5] “QBCMVT: An Effective Quantum-Based CoatiMobileViT Model for Intrusion Detection in IIoT,” Computers and Electrical Engineering, vol. 126, 2025.
Publication Date
5/23/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...