Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM54268
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Infrastructure projects, particularly those within complex environments such as public-private partnerships (PPP) and large-scale transportation, are highly susceptible to risks that can escalate costs, extend timelines, and reduce project quality. A review of contemporary risk management frameworks in infrastructure projects highlights key developments and emerging trends in the field, including lifecycle risk management, stakeholder involvement, and the integration of digital tools. Studies by McKinsey & Company (2023), Rao et al. (2024), and others reveal that effective risk management requires a holistic, adaptive, and context-specific approach. A focus on early-phase risk management (front-end loading) and continuous monitoring systems are identified as critical for project success. Furthermore, the integration of advanced tools such as Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) enhances decision-making and ensures better risk identification and mitigation strategies. The review also stresses the need for governance structures, customisation for local contexts, and an emphasis on long-term operational and maintenance risks to ensure sustained project success across the lifecycle. These findings suggest that risk frameworks should be flexible, comprehensive, and capable of adapting to diverse project types, geographies, and institutional contexts.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/21/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...