Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM25656
Volume:
7 |
9 |
Sep 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This study explores the paradigm-shifting impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on sentiment analysis, systematically evaluating five prominent machine learning algorithms: K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB). Through extensive empirical analysis and performance metrics assessment, we discern Random Forest as the most promising and transformative choice for AI-driven sentiment analysis. It consistently exhibits superior accuracy and interpretability across various sentiment analysis tasks, highlighting its potential to revolutionize sentiment analysis within the AI domain. In addition to technical evaluations, we briefly address ethical considerations tied to AI-driven sentiment analysis, including potential biases and transparency issues inherent to machine learning models. Responsible AI practices and mitigation strategies are emphasized to ensure fair and reliable sentiment analysis outcomes. In conclusion, this research advocates for the continued integration of Random Forest in AI-powered sentiment analysis systems, offering valuable insights for decision-making, user experience enhancement, and a more profound comprehension of public sentiment. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse surrounding AI’s role in sentiment analysis, serving as a practical reference for researchers and practitioners in the field.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/8/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...