Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM65558

Risk-Adjusted Performance Evaluation of SBI Mutual Fund Schemes: Evidence from India's Equity and Debt Markets

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM65558

Volume:

10 |

6 |

Jun 2026

Pages:

1-11

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM65558

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

DKMR

DR K Mallikarjuna Rao

Associate Professor & Head, Department of Commerce

Government City College (Autonomous), Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Download Author Certificate
PT

Pothuganti Thejaswini

Associate Professor & Head, Department of Commerce

Government City College (Autonomous), Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Mutual fund performance evaluation using risk-adjusted metrics constitutes a fundamental pillar of investment decision-making, particularly in the context of India's rapidly expanding asset management industry, which crossed ₹63 lakh crore in Assets Under Management (AUM) in early 2024 (AMFI, 2024). This study evaluates the short-term risk-adjusted performance of four selected SBI Mutual Fund schemes — SBI Bluechip Fund (Large Cap), SBI Magnum Taxgain Fund (ELSS), SBI Contra Fund, and SBI Global Fund — over a 45-day study window from February 20, 2026, to April 6, 2026, a period characterised by a significant market correction followed by a sharp recovery. Employing three canonical performance evaluation metrics — the Sharpe Ratio, Treynor Ratio, and Jensen's Alpha — against a risk-free rate of 6.5% per annum and the NIFTY 50 as the benchmark index, the study finds that all four funds significantly outperformed the market on risk-adjusted terms. SBI Magnum Taxgain Fund ranks first on both Sharpe (6.51) and Treynor (85.08) ratios, indicating superior risk management relative to both total and systematic risk. SBI Bluechip Fund records the highest Jensen's Alpha (69.31), reflecting maximum fund manager skill in generating abnormal returns above CAPM expectations. SBI Global Fund ranks last on all three metrics, partly attributable to global market headwinds. The study concludes that active fund management in the SBI stable has delivered substantial alpha during this volatile period and offers actionable portfolio allocation insights for retail and institutional investors in India.

KEYWORDS

Mutual Fund Performance; Sharpe Ratio; Treynor Ratio; Jensen's Alpha; NAV Analysis; SBI Mutual Fund; Risk-Adjusted Returns; NIFTY 50; India Capital Markets; ELSS.

Cite This Article

DR K Mallikarjuna Rao, Pothuganti Thejaswini, "Risk-Adjusted Performance Evaluation of SBI Mutual Fund Schemes: Evidence from India's Equity and Debt Markets," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1-11, Jun 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM65558

Full Article/Conclusion

This study provides a rigorous, data-driven evaluation of the short-term risk-adjusted performance of four SBI Mutual Fund schemes over a volatile 45-day market window characterised by a significant corrective phase and a robust recovery. The principal findings are as follows: all four schemes significantly outperformed the NIFTY 50 benchmark on total period return (8.80%–10.91% vs. 1.58%); SBI Magnum Taxgain Fund ranks first on both Sharpe (6.51) and Treynor (85.08) ratios, identifying it as the most risk-efficient scheme; SBI Bluechip Fund records the highest Jensen's Alpha (69.31), reflecting the greatest manager-attributable excess return; SBI Contra Fund demonstrates balanced performance (2nd on Jensen's Alpha); and SBI Global Fund trails on all three metrics, reflecting the additional uncertainty of international market exposure.

References

Association of Mutual Funds in India [AMFI]. (2024). Indian mutual fund industry statistics and AUM data. AMFI. https://www.amfiindia.com Association of Mutual Funds in India [AMFI]. (2026). Mutual fund NAV reports and industry statistics. AMFI. https://www.amfiindia.com Anand Gupta, & Indrasan Prasad. (2026). Growth prospects of mutual funds in India: Investor awareness and SIP adoption. Journal of Indian Financial Markets, 12(1), 33–51. Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2021). Investments (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. Chandra, P. (2017). Investment analysis and portfolio management (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., & Busse, J. A. (2004). Are investors rational? Choices among index funds. Journal of Finance, 59(1), 261–288. Hanumanth N. Mustari. (2026). Risk-return analysis of selected equity mutual funds in India using Sharpe Ratio and Jensen's Alpha. Indian Journal of Capital Market Research, 8(2), 77–94. ICRA Limited. (2025). Mutual fund industry performance review. ICRA Research Publications. https://www.icra.in Jain, A., & Jain, P. (2022). ELSS funds in India: Performance, investor behaviour, and the role of lock-in. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 23(4), 401–418. Jensen, M. C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389–416. Kiran Kumar, & Anjali Sharma. (2025). Growth and performance of mutual funds in India: Digital platforms and investor awareness. South Asian Journal of Finance and Commerce, 9(1), 55–72. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age International Publishers.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

6/26/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

6

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...