Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM64627

Risk–Return Analysis of Nifty 50 and Selected Sectoral Indices in India

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM64627

Volume:

10 |

6 |

Jun 2026

Pages:

1-9

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM64627

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

DKR

Dr.R.Praveen Kumar Reddy

Commerce

Government Degree College, Kukatpally, Hyderabad

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

The Indian stock market comprises sectors with different return-generating characteristics and levels of risk. Evaluating sectoral indices in relation to the Nifty 50 benchmark can help investors understand differences in performance, volatility and risk-adjusted returns. This study examines the risk–return characteristics of nine selected sectoral indices in India—Nifty Auto, Nifty FMCG, Nifty IT, Nifty Media, Nifty Metal, Nifty Pharma, Nifty PSU Bank, Nifty Realty and Nifty G-Sec—against the Nifty 50 benchmark during the period from 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2026. The study employs average returns, standard deviation, beta, Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio and Jensen's alpha to assess sectoral performance. An annual risk-free rate of 5.86% is used for calculating risk-adjusted performance measures. The results indicate that Nifty PSU Bank recorded the highest annualized arithmetic return and the highest Sharpe and Treynor ratios. Nifty Metal and Nifty Auto also exhibited strong performance. In contrast, Nifty Media and Nifty IT recorded negative risk-adjusted performance, while Nifty G-Sec reported the lowest Sharpe and Treynor ratios. Jensen's alpha results indicate positive estimated risk-adjusted performance for Nifty PSU Bank, Nifty Metal, Nifty Auto, Nifty Realty and Nifty Pharma. The findings demonstrate substantial differences in the historical performance of Indian sectoral indices and highlight the importance of considering risk alongside returns when evaluating market performance.

KEYWORDS

Nifty 50 sectoral indices risk–return analysis beta Sharpe ratio Treynor ratio Jensen's alpha Indian stock market.

Cite This Article

Dr.R.Praveen Kumar Reddy, "Risk–Return Analysis of Nifty 50 and Selected Sectoral Indices in India," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1-9, Jun 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM64627

Full Article/Conclusion

This study evaluated the risk–return characteristics of the Nifty 50 and nine selected sectoral indices in India over the period from 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2026. Using an annual risk-free rate of 5.86%, the analysis employed standard deviation, beta, Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio and Jensen's alpha to compare historical sectoral performance. The findings reveal substantial differences in the return and risk profiles of the selected indices. Nifty PSU Bank emerged as the strongest performer on the basis of annualized arithmetic return, Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio and Jensen's alpha. Nifty Metal and Nifty Auto also demonstrated comparatively strong performance, while Nifty Pharma and Nifty Realty recorded positive Jensen's alpha estimates. In contrast, Nifty IT and Nifty Media displayed weak risk-adjusted performance, and Nifty G-Sec recorded the lowest Sharpe ratio. These results indicate that the sector generating the highest return is not necessarily the sector with the lowest volatility, and that investment performance should be evaluated using several complementary measures. The study contributes to understanding the historical performance differences between Indian sectoral indices and the broad market benchmark. However, the results should be interpreted within the limitations of the sample period, the use of price-index returns, and the assumption of a constant annual risk-free rate. Further research could extend the analysis by incorporating total-return indices, time-varying risk-free rates, regression-based significance tests for Jensen's alpha and additional measures of downside risk.

References

1.                Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. The Journal of Business, 39(1, Part 2), 119–138. 2.                Treynor, J. L. (1965). How to rate management of investment funds. Harvard Business Review, 43(1), 63–75. 3.                Jensen, M. C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. The Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389–416. 4.                Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91. 5.                Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442. 6.                National Stock Exchange of India. Official index information and historical market data. https://www.nseindia.com/ 7.                Latha,C.S.,Ramya,K.,(2025). A Comparative Analysis of Risk And Return with Special Reference to Financial Service Listed in Nifty 50 Stocks. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(2) ,766-772. 8.                Reddy,B.S.,Sreekanth,B.,(2025). A Study on the performance evaluation of selected IT stocks listed on the BSE. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews(IJRAR), 12(3), 33-37. 9.                 Manoj,K.S.,Kavitha,A.K.,(2023). A Study on risk-return analysis of selected IT and Automobiles companies listed on NSE. Indian Journal of Emerging Research in Business and Technology, 3(1), 42-54. 10.              Kumar,V.L.,Jyothi,S.A.,(2022). Risk – Return Evaluation of selected Pharma Stocks trading in NSE. Journal of Management and Science, 12(1), 36-41.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

6/25/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...