Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64425
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
MBA
KG Reddy College of Engineering and Technology
MBA
KG Reddy College of Engineering and Technology
The world of technology is changing really fast and companies are becoming more and more dependent on computer systems. This has changed the way companies work in a way.. With all these changes there are also more threats to companies computer systems, like malware and ransomware attacks, phishing and data breaches. As companies use digital systems and store their information on the internet they really need to have good cybersecurity. This is not a technical issue it is a big part of how companies make decisions. So companies are spending a lot of money on cybersecurity, including security technologies, systems to detect threats training for employees and plans to manage risks. Even though companies are spending more money on cybersecurity it is still hard to know if this money is being well spent. This is because cybersecurity is about preventing bad things from happening and it is hard to measure this.This study looks at how to measure if the money companies spend on cybersecurity is an investment. It uses risk management to help figure out if cybersecurity efforts are working. The study looks at ways to measure if cybersecurity is effective including how much money is saved and how many threats are stopped. It also looks at how it takes to detect and respond to threats and how much money is saved by avoiding incidents. The study shows that by using these measures companies can make decisions about how to spend their money on cybersecurity. It also shows that using risk management can help companies reduce their risks and make their computer systems more secure. By looking at cybersecurity in a structured way companies can make better decisions and be more secure in the long run.
KEYWORDS
The increasing dependence on digital technologies and information systems has significantly expanded cybersecurity challenges for organizations. As cyber threats continue to become more sophisticated and frequent, organizations are compelled to invest heavily in cybersecurity initiatives to protect information assets and ensure business continuity. However, evaluating the Return on Investment of cybersecurity expenditures remains a difficult task due to the preventive and intangible nature of security benefits. The present study examined the ROI of cybersecurity investments using a risk management metrics approach and highlighted the importance of measurable indicators in investment evaluation. The study identified key metrics such as Annual Loss Expectancy, Mean Time to Detect, Mean Time to Respond, and incident reduction measures as valuable tools for assessing investment effectiveness. Findings indicate that integrating risk management metrics with cybersecurity planning improves decision-making, enhances resource allocation, and supports long-term strategic objectives. The study concludes that traditional financial measures alone are insufficient for evaluating cybersecurity investments. Organizations require comprehensive frameworks that incorporate risk reduction outcomes and operational performance indicators. Adopting a metric-driven approach enables organizations to justify security expenditures, optimize investment strategies, and strengthen their overall cybersecurity posture. Therefore, risk management metrics play a crucial role in enhancing cybersecurity investment effectiveness and ensuring organizational sustainability in an increasingly digital environment.
1. Gordon, L. A., & Loeb, M. P. (2002). The economics of information security investment. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 5(4), 438–457. 2. Anderson, R., & Moore, T. (2006). The economics of information security. Science, 314(5799), 610–613. 3. Böhme, R. (2010). Security metrics and security investment models. Advances in Information and Computer Security, 10–24. 4. Mukhopadhyay, A., Chatterjee, S., Saha, D., Mahanti, A., & Sadhukhan, S. (2013). Cyber-risk decision models: To insure IT or not? Decision Support Systems, 56, 11–26. 5. Peltier, T. R. (2016). Information Security Policies, Procedures, and Standards: Guidelines for Effective Information Security Management. CRC Press. 6. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press. 7. Whitman, M. E., & Mattord, H. J. (2018). Principles of Information Security (6th ed.). Cengage Learning. 8. Stallings, W., & Brown, L. (2018). Computer Security: Principles and Practice (4th ed.). Pearson Education. 9. Kshetri, N. (2021). Cybersecurity management and investment strategies: An organizational perspective. Journal of Cyber Policy, 6(2), 145–162. 10. Alshaikh, M. (2020). Developing cybersecurity culture to influence employee behavior. Computers & Security, 98, 102003.
Publication Date
6/2/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...