Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM64425

ROI of Cyber Security Investments: A Risk Management Metrics Approach

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM64425

Volume:

10 |

6 |

Jun 2026

Pages:

1-9

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM64425

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

MSY

Mallagoni Shiva Yadav

MBA

KG Reddy College of Engineering and Technology

Download Author Certificate

Mentors

CG

CHENNAKESHI GANESH

MBA

KG Reddy College of Engineering and Technology

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

The world of technology is changing really fast and companies are becoming more and more dependent on computer systems. This has changed the way companies work in a way.. With all these changes there are also more threats to companies computer systems, like malware and ransomware attacks, phishing and data breaches. As companies use digital systems and store their information on the internet they really need to have good cybersecurity. This is not a technical issue it is a big part of how companies make decisions. So companies are spending a lot of money on cybersecurity, including security technologies, systems to detect threats training for employees and plans to manage risks. Even though companies are spending more money on cybersecurity it is still hard to know if this money is being well spent. This is because cybersecurity is about preventing bad things from happening and it is hard to measure this.This study looks at how to measure if the money companies spend on cybersecurity is an investment. It uses risk management to help figure out if cybersecurity efforts are working. The study looks at ways to measure if cybersecurity is effective including how much money is saved and how many threats are stopped. It also looks at how it takes to detect and respond to threats and how much money is saved by avoiding incidents. The study shows that by using these measures companies can make decisions about how to spend their money on cybersecurity. It also shows that using risk management can help companies reduce their risks and make their computer systems more secure. By looking at cybersecurity in a structured way companies can make better decisions and be more secure in the long run.

KEYWORDS

Cyber Security Return on Investment Risk Management Security Metrics Information Security Cyber Threats Investment Evaluation Annual Loss Expectancy Risk Reduction Information Systems Security.

Cite This Article

Mallagoni Shiva Yadav, CHENNAKESHI GANESH, "ROI of Cyber Security Investments: A Risk Management Metrics Approach," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1-9, Jun 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM64425

Full Article/Conclusion

The increasing dependence on digital technologies and information systems has significantly expanded cybersecurity challenges for organizations. As cyber threats continue to become more sophisticated and frequent, organizations are compelled to invest heavily in cybersecurity initiatives to protect information assets and ensure business continuity. However, evaluating the Return on Investment of cybersecurity expenditures remains a difficult task due to the preventive and intangible nature of security benefits. The present study examined the ROI of cybersecurity investments using a risk management metrics approach and highlighted the importance of measurable indicators in investment evaluation. The study identified key metrics such as Annual Loss Expectancy, Mean Time to Detect, Mean Time to Respond, and incident reduction measures as valuable tools for assessing investment effectiveness. Findings indicate that integrating risk management metrics with cybersecurity planning improves decision-making, enhances resource allocation, and supports long-term strategic objectives. The study concludes that traditional financial measures alone are insufficient for evaluating cybersecurity investments. Organizations require comprehensive frameworks that incorporate risk reduction outcomes and operational performance indicators. Adopting a metric-driven approach enables organizations to justify security expenditures, optimize investment strategies, and strengthen their overall cybersecurity posture. Therefore, risk management metrics play a crucial role in enhancing cybersecurity investment effectiveness and ensuring organizational sustainability in an increasingly digital environment.

References

1.                Gordon, L. A., & Loeb, M. P. (2002). The economics of information security investment. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 5(4), 438–457. 2.                Anderson, R., & Moore, T. (2006). The economics of information security. Science, 314(5799), 610–613. 3.                Böhme, R. (2010). Security metrics and security investment models. Advances in Information and Computer Security, 10–24. 4.                Mukhopadhyay, A., Chatterjee, S., Saha, D., Mahanti, A., & Sadhukhan, S. (2013). Cyber-risk decision models: To insure IT or not? Decision Support Systems, 56, 11–26. 5.                Peltier, T. R. (2016). Information Security Policies, Procedures, and Standards: Guidelines for Effective Information Security Management. CRC Press. 6.                Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press. 7.                Whitman, M. E., & Mattord, H. J. (2018). Principles of Information Security (6th ed.). Cengage Learning. 8.                Stallings, W., & Brown, L. (2018). Computer Security: Principles and Practice (4th ed.). Pearson Education. 9.                Kshetri, N. (2021). Cybersecurity management and investment strategies: An organizational perspective. Journal of Cyber Policy, 6(2), 145–162. 10.             Alshaikh, M. (2020). Developing cybersecurity culture to influence employee behavior. Computers & Security, 98, 102003.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

6/2/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

6

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...