Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67618
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Information technology and Computer science
Information technology and computer science, D.G Ruparel College of Arts ,Commerce & Science
Department of Information technology and Computer science
Information technology and computer science, D.G Ruparel College of Arts ,Commerce & Science
Department of Information technology and Computer science
Information technology and computer science, D.G Ruparel College of Arts ,Commerce & Science
The increasing use of the internet and digital services has led to a rise in phishing attacks and online scams. Cybercriminals use deceptive emails, messages, websites, links, and social engineering to steal sensitive information or financially exploit users. Traditional detection methods based on rules and blacklists may fail to identify new or modified attacks. Artificial Intelligence (AI), through Machine Learning (ML), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and anomaly detection, can help identify suspicious patterns and detect potential threats. This paper examines the role of AI in detecting phishing attacks and online scams, while also highlighting the importance of user awareness and the challenges of traditional detection methods.
KEYWORDS
Phishing attacks and online scams continue to create security risks for internet users. Traditional detection methods can help identify known threats, but attackers can modify websites, URLs, emails, and messages to avoid detection. Artificial Intelligence provides useful techniques for analysing large amounts of digital information and identifying suspicious patterns. Machine Learning can be used for analysing URLs and websites, while Natural Language Processing can help examine suspicious emails and scam messages. However, AI-based detection should be considered as an additional layer of cybersecurity rather than a complete replacement for user awareness. Users still need to understand common phishing techniques and carefully evaluate suspicious links, messages, websites, and requests for sensitive information. Overall, Artificial Intelligence has an important role in supporting the detection of phishing attacks and online scams. Combining AI-based security techniques with user awareness can provide a more effective approach to reducing the risks associated with online threats.
1. A. A. Chiew, K. S. C. Yong, and C. L. Tan, “A survey of phishing attacks: Their types, vectors and technical approaches,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 106, pp. 1–20, 2018. 2. M. Khonji, A. Iraqi, and A. Jones, “Phishing detection: A literature survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2091–2121, 2013. 3. Y. Zhang, J. Hong, and J. Cranor, “CANTINA: A content-based approach to detecting phishing web sites,” in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2007, pp. 639–648. 4. Google, “Safe Browsing,” Google Safety Center. Google Safe Browsing. 5. VirusTotal, “VirusTotal: Free Online Virus, Malware and URL Scanner.” VirusTotal. 6. A. AlEroud and G. Karabatis, “A contextualized phishing detection framework,” Journal of Information Security and Applications, vol. 46, pp. 118–129, 2019. 7. M. F. A. Shbair, T. Nybom, and A. Kurtz, “Phishing detection using machine learning techniques,” IEEE Access, relevant literature on machine-learning-based phishing detection. 8. Federal Trade Commission, “Phishing,” Consumer Advice. Federal Trade Commission – Phishing. 9. National Institute of Standards and Technology, “Phishing,” NIST Computer Security Resource Center. NIST Cybersecurity Resources. 10. Microsoft, “Microsoft Defender SmartScreen,” Microsoft Support. Microsoft Defender SmartScreen.
Publication Date
10/2/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
3
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...