Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64339
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

MBA
Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Management Studies, Pune (India)

MBA
Adhalrao Patil Institute of Management and Research, Pune (India)
This study examines the role of debt finance in capital structure with a specific focus on the proportion of borrowed capital and lease finance among listed companies in the Information Technology (IT) and Pharmaceutical sectors. While traditional capital structure theories emphasize the overall level of leverage, this research extends the analysis by disaggregating debt into its key components—borrowed debt (both long-term and short-term) and lease finance (long-term and short-term). The study aims to identify whether significant differences exist in the composition of debt and its implications for financing decisions. The research is based on secondary data collected from selected listed companies, and appropriate statistical tools have been employed to analyze the proportions of different debt components. The findings reveal a statistically significant difference between the proportions of borrowed capital and lease finance, indicating that firms adopt distinct approaches in utilizing these sources of debt. This suggests that lease financing is not merely a substitute for traditional borrowing but serves a different strategic and operational purpose within the capital structure. However, the study finds no significant difference in the proportion of debt-equity financing, implying that despite variations in internal debt composition, firms maintain a relatively stable overall leverage structure. This reflects the tendency of firms to adhere to target capital structures while adjusting the internal mix of debt instruments. The study contributes to existing literature by highlighting the importance of debt composition, particularly in sectoral contexts, and provides insights for financial managers in optimizing financing strategies under varying economic and operational conditions.
KEYWORDS
The study examined the role of borrowed and lease debt finance in determining the capital structure of companies across two independent categories. Four major debt finance variables, namely LTBDP, LTLLDP, STBDP, and STLLDP, were analysed using statistical techniques. The normality assessment revealed that the data did not follow a normal distribution, thereby necessitating the use of non-parametric methods for hypothesis testing. Consequently, the Mann–Whitney U test was identified as the most appropriate statistical technique for group comparison. The findings indicate that both borrowed debt and lease/liability debt constitute important components of corporate financing decisions. Long-term borrowed debt supports strategic and capital-intensive investments, while lease and liability financing contributes to operational flexibility and short-term financial management. The study highlights the importance of balanced debt financing practices in achieving an efficient capital structure. Overall, the analysis demonstrates that debt finance decisions are influenced by the financial policies and structural characteristics of companies, thereby playing a crucial role in long-term financial stability and organizational growth.
1. Myers, S. C. (2001). Capital structure. Journal of Economic perspectives, 15(2), 81-102. 2. Rauh, J. D., & Sufi, A. (2010). Capital structure and debt structure. The review of financial studies, 23(12), 4242-4280. 3. Bradley, M., Jarrell, G. A., & Kim, E. H. (1984). On the existence of an optimal capital structure: Theory and evidence. The journal of Finance, 39(3), 857-878. 4. Dias Jr, A., & Ioannou, P. G. (1995). Debt capacity and optimal capital structure for privately financed infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(4), 404-414. 5. Chen, J., & Strange, R. (2005). The determinants of capital structure: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Economic change and Restructuring, 38(1), 11-35. 6. Sadiq, M., Yousaf, S. U., Anser, M. K., Sriyanto, S., Zaman, K., Van Tu, D., & Anis, S. N. M. (2023). The role of debt financing in the relationship between capital structure, firm’s value, and macroeconomic factors: To throw caution to the wind. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 87, 212-223. 7. Graham, J. R., & Leary, M. T. (2011). A review of empirical capital structure research and directions for the future. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 3, 309–345. 8. Parsons, C., & Titman, S. (2009). Empirical capital structure: A review. Foundations and Trends in Finance, 3(1), 1–93. 9. Journal of Economics and Business. (2020). Determinants of capital structure complexity, 110, 105905. 10. Kruk, S. (2021). Impact of capital structure on corporate value—Review of literature. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), 155.
Publication Date
5/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...