Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63384
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Mechanical Engineering
K.K. POLYTECHNIC, DHANBAD
Department of Mechanical Engineering
K.K. POLYTECHNIC, DHANBAD
Department of Mechanical Engineering
K.K. POLYTECHNIC, DHANBAD
Department of Mechanical Engineering
K.K. POLYTECHNIC, DHANBAD
Department of Mechanical Engineering
K.K. POLYTECHNIC, DHANBAD
Department of Mechanical Engineering
K.K. POLYTECHNIC, DHANBAD
Due to the extensive use of non-renewable sources of energy such as coal and coke breeze in the production of iron ore sinter, the iron and steel industry is regarded as one of the leading emitters of carbon dioxide emissions globally. The use of biomass as an eco-friendly substitute has been made feasible due to its abundance and carbon neutrality. There are various problems associated with using raw biomass owing to the high moisture content, low energy density, poor grindability, inconsistent burning behavior, and difficulties in transportation. Torrefaction and briquetting are two significant processing techniques that can greatly improve the qualities of biomass as a fuel source for industries. This research investigates the characteristics of biomass, the effects of torrefaction on its properties, different methods for the production of briquettes, and their interaction to influence the quality of fuel, its combustion performance, and sintering performance. Research indicates that torrefied briquettes of biomass exhibit better handling characteristics, high mechanical strength, minimal moisture content, and high calorific value compared to untreated biomass. Using enhanced biomass in the process of sintering not only helps in reducing environmental pollution by minimizing the use of fossil fuels but also cuts down on the consumption of coke.
KEYWORDS
It has been established through the present study that biomass is very promising as an alternative fuel that is eco-friendly and renewable for iron ore sintering. Nonetheless, various unfavorable attributes, such as excessive moisture, low density, high volatiles, low grindability, and unpredictable burning, prevent the utilization of the biomass feedstock as-is in its natural state. In industrial sintering operations, these limitations reduce thermal efficiency and pose operational difficulties. Torrefaction emerged as an effective method of upgrading biomass, which enhanced numerous physical, chemical, and thermal properties of the biomass fuel. The process elevated carbon content, energy value, hydrophobicity, and burning efficiency while reducing moisture and volatiles. Torrefied biomass is more suitable for combustion along with conventional fuels due to better grindability and coal-like nature of biomass in iron ore sintering plants.Moreover, the study revealed that briquetting improved the suitability of biomass due to higher bulk density, mechanical strength, storage ability, and transportation properties. As compared with loose raw biomass, biomass briquettes have proved more stable and effective in terms of combustion efficiency, low dust formation, and improved handling properties. Stable combustion leads to better heat generation in the sintering bed, resulting in stable sinter formation.From experimental results, it was found that utilization of torrefied biomass as a partial substitute for coke breeze reduces GHG emissions, fossil fuel consumption, and no significant decrease was observed in the production of sinter. Due to their low sulfur and nitrogen content, biomass-based fuels emitted lower levels of sulfur oxide and nitrogen oxide, thus promoting environmentally friendly steel production techniques.Despite the advantages associated with torrefaction and briquetting, there are several constraints such as preprocessing cost, energy input, biomass availability, and process optimization that hinder their full industrial implementation. For industrial-level processes, there is a need for further research on optimal conditions for torrefaction, biomass replacement rates, reactor design, and cost-effectiveness.Having analyzed all aspects, torrefied and briquetted biomass can be considered an appropriate fuel source for iron ore sintering and has a great potential to reduce carbon footprint, improve waste management, and foster sustainable development in the iron and steel industry.
[1] H. Suopajärvi, E. Pongrácz, and T. Fabritius, “Biomass for iron ore sintering,” Minerals Engineering, vol. 23, no. 14, pp. 1139–1145, 2010. [2] S. Reis, P. J. Holliman, C. Martin, and E. Jones, “Biomass–Coal Hybrid Fuel: A Route to Net-Zero Iron Ore Sintering,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 5495, 2023. [3] J. Koppejan and S. van Loo, The Handbook of Biomass Combustion and Co-firing. London, U.K.: Earthscan, 2012. [4] P. Basu, Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction, 3rd ed. Academic Press, 2018. [5] M. Niesler, J. Stecko, S. Stelmach, and A. Kwiecińska-Mydlak, “Biochars in Iron Ores Sintering Process: Effect on Sinter Quality and Emission,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 3749, 2021. [6] M. A. Waheed, O. A. Akogun, and C. C. Enweremadu, “An overview of torrefied bioresource briquettes: quality-influencing parameters, enhancement through torrefaction and applications,” Bioresources and Bioprocessing, vol. 9, no. 122, 2022. [7] Y. Ueki et al., “Characteristics of woody biomass and its application in iron ore sintering,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 2006–2014, 2011. [8] M. J. Prins, K. J. Ptasinski, and F. J. Janssen, “Torrefaction of wood: Part 1. Weight loss kinetics,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 2006. [9] B. Chen and J. Kuo, “Torrefaction and characterization of biomass energy,” Energy, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2580–2586, 2010. [10] S. Van der Stelt et al., “Biomass upgrading by torrefaction for the production of biofuels,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 3748–3762, 2011.
Publication Date
5/18/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...