Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67441

Runtime Monitoring and Risk-Adaptive Control for LLM Agents

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67441

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-5

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67441

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Deepak Kumar Gour

Deepak Kumar Gour

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Jyoti Vidhyapeth Woman's University, Jaipur

Download Author Certificate

Mentors

DSA

Dr Sushma Agrawal

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Jyoti Vidhyapeth Woman's University, Jaipur

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Tool-enabled large language model agents can retrieve content, call external tools, and initiate actions. These capabilities also create exposure to prompt injection, unsafe tool use, data leakage, and poorly bounded autonomy. This paper documents AgentGuard, a CPU-only prototype that combines a lexical Secure Runtime Monitoring Protocol (SRMP), a six-factor Adaptive Agent Risk Scoring model (AARS), and a Risk-Adaptive Scheduling State Machine (RASS). The study analyses archived simulation records rather than a new deployment experiment. In the primary 200-event simulation, the combined pipeline produced a precision of 0.905, recall of 0.792, F1 of 0.844, and specificity of 0.974 against SRMP-linked reference labels. Across ten fixed-seed runs, mean F1 was 0.791 (SD 0.051; run-level bootstrap 95% CI 0.760-0.819). The lexical layer was vulnerable to evasion: detection fell from 0.76 on original attack prompts to 0.12 after synonym substitution and combined perturbations, while recall on a 64-prompt internal benchmark was 0.529. Because some labels are generated from SRMP output, the evaluation is not independent. The findings are therefore an internal characterization of an inspectable prototype, not evidence of operational detection performance. The paper identifies the validation needed before deployment-oriented claims can be made.

KEYWORDS

LLM agents; runtime monitoring; prompt injection; risk scoring; adaptive control; agent security; simulation evaluation

Cite This Article

Deepak Kumar Gour, Dr Sushma Agrawal, "Runtime Monitoring and Risk-Adaptive Control for LLM Agents," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-5, Sep 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67441

Full Article/Conclusion

AgentGuard shows how lexical monitoring, composite risk scoring, and adaptive control can be assembled in a small, inspectable runtime prototype. In the archived simulations, the main run records F1=0.844 and the ten-seed mean is 0.791. The equal-weight ablation also shows how strongly the decision depends on the security factor. At the same time, the evidence sets firm limits on the claim: lexical transformations sharply reduce detection, recall on the internal benchmark is modest, labels overlap with SRMP output, and latency is simulated rather than measured. The present contribution is therefore an auditable research baseline, not a deployment-ready security claim. AgentGuard preserves event-level records and exposes each stage of its control logic, making it possible to investigate failure rather than treating the monitor as a black box. The next phase should introduce independently adjudicated labels, public agent benchmarks, semantic and trace-based monitors alongside the lexical rules, measured enforcement overhead, and an explicit analysis of how false interventions affect task completion. That evidence is needed before the prototype can be assessed as an operational runtime defence.

References

[1] OWASP GenAI Security Project, “LLM01:2025 Prompt Injection,” OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications, 2024. [2] M. Mazeika et al., “HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal,” in Proc. ICML, 2024. [3] M. Andriushchenko et al., “AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents,” in Proc. ICLR, 2025. [4] Q. Zhan, Z. Liang, Z. Ying, and D. Kang, “InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents,” in Findings of ACL, 2024. [5] H. Zhang et al., “Agent Security Bench: Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in LLM-Based Agents,” in Proc. ICLR, 2025. [6] C. Autio et al., Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile, NIST AI 600-1, 2024. [7] OWASP GenAI Security Project, State of Agentic AI Security and Governance, ver. 2.01, 2026. [8] Y. Mou et al., “ToolSafe: Enhancing Tool Invocation Safety of LLM-Based Agents via Proactive Step-Level Guardrail and Feedback,” arXiv:2601.10156, 2026. [9] “Runtime Policy Enforcement for MCP-Based LLM Agents,” Electronics, 2026. [10] A. H. Müller et al., “Classifier Calibration: A Survey on How to Assess and Improve Predicted Class Probabilities,” Machine Learning, vol. 112, pp. 3211–3260, 2023.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/24/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

4

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...