Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM59639
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Fake reviews have become a persistent problem on restaurant and hospitality platforms, quietly eroding the trust consumers place in peer ratings. Most existing detection approaches rely solely on either text-based natural language processing or simple behavioral heuristics, leaving meaningful predictive signal untapped. This paper introduces ReviewScan, a three-stream ensemble that processes each review through three parallel channels: (i) 384-dimensional dense embeddings from a Sentence-BERT (SBERT) transformer; (ii) 27 behavioral features drawn from reviewer profile metadata, including 10 novel interaction terms developed specifically for this work; and (iii) 32 scalar outputs from a Mamdani fuzzy inference engine that converts expert suspicion rules into continuous scores. All three channels are concatenated into a single 443-dimensional vector and fed to a class-balanced Random Forest of 300 trees. On the publicly available Yelp Chicago restaurant review benchmark of 26,955 labeled samples, ReviewScan achieves 88.63% accuracy and an AUC-ROC of 0.9393, outperforming TF-IDF baselines, a standalone SBERT model, and behavioral-only classifiers. A seven-way ablation study confirms statistically significant, non-overlapping contributions from each channel (p < 0.05, McNemar’s test). The full pipeline runs as a REST API and completes end-to-end inference in 152 ms on standard CPU hardware.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
9/3/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...