Securing Agentic AI: Emerging Security Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Defensive Mechanisms

Agentic AI is a next-level development in the field of artificial intelligence because of the ability of these systems to reason, plan, use tools, gather information, memorize facts and carry out actions. Nevertheless, such functionality brings considerable challenges for security and privacy of agentic AI systems. Agentic AI systems can operate with an environment and use various tools and APIs. They can access sensitive information and execute complex actions consisting of several steps. Thus, any vulnerability in the system may lead to the leakage of data and compromise the overall security of an agentic AI system.In this research, the most important threats related to agentic AI were analyzed. Direct and indirect prompt injection, data poisoning, sensitive information disclosure, excessive agency, privilege escalation, insecure tool usage, and supply-chain attack were selected as examples. At the same time, different types of vulnerabilities were analyzed including those associated with AI model, memory and context, tools and APIs, authentication and authorization, data and retrieval systems, execution environment, and monitoring. Recently, NIST highlighted the significance of identity, authorization, auditing, and controls for AI agents' interaction with data, tools, and applications.As the results of analysis show, the problem of agentic AI security cannot be solved using one security measure. Thus, such measures as least privilege access, proper authentication and authorization, input/output validation, sandboxing and isolation of tools, memory management, runtime monitoring, anomalies detection, actions verification, and human monitoring are critical. The point is that the permissions and capabilities of an agent play an important role in ensuring agentic AI security since the environment and tools can increase the potential impact of an action. NIST emphasizes the importance of least privilege, agent identity, authorization, auditing, and prompt injection mitigation for agentic AI security.As such, it is essential that the security of agentic AI is evaluated at all stages of the lifecycle – from design, development, implementation to monitoring and ongoing security testing. With agentic AI becoming increasingly competent and autonomous, future research should concentrate on developing standardized tests of security, strong systems of identity and authorization of agents, architecture of memory and tools used, detection of indirect attacks, and approaches to ensuring meaningful human control.In summary, agentic AI systems have significant promise when it comes to supporting highly complex and autonomous tasks; however, their use requires proper security and privacy measures. Proper technical controls, access limitations, monitoring, proper architecture of the systems in question, and human supervision are likely to decrease the danger posed by the use of autonomous AI systems.  

1.      Srinivasan, J., Regi, S. A., Anbarasan, A. K., Suresh, A., Vetriselvi, T., & Venu, S., “Detection and analysis of prompt injection in Indian multilingual large language models,” Scientific Reports, vol. 16, 16208, 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-43883-0. — Vellore Institute of Technology, India. 2.      Balakrishnan, P., & Leema, A. A., “Vulnerabilities and Defenses: A Monograph on Comprehensive Analysis of Security Attacks on Large Language Models,” Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 2025, doi: 10.51983/ijiss-2025.IJISS.15.2.54. — Vellore Institute of Technology, India. 3.      Mathew, E. S., “Enhancing Security in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Review of Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses,” Journal on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7, pp. 347–363, 2025, doi: 10.32604/jai.2025.069841. — Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, India. 4.      Thakur, V., & Garg, U., “Defending against prompt injection attacks in LLMs,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 3297, 050021, 2025, doi: 10.1063/5.0286966. — Delhi Technological University, New Delhi, India. 5.      Jain, B., Pawar, P., Gada, D., Patwa, T., Kanani, P., Patil, D., & Kurup, L., “Comprehensive Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models on Prompt Injection Classification Using Natural Language Processing Techniques,” International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Technovation, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 24–37, 2025, doi: 10.54392/irjmt2523. — Dwarkadas J. Sanghvi College of Engineering, Mumbai, India. 6.      Teckani, H., Pandya, D., & Makwana, H., “Secure Artificial Intelligence (SAI): A Dual-layer Defence Model Against Prompt Injection and Prompt Poisoning Attacks,” International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 7, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i01.35371. — Silver Oak University, Ahmedabad, India. 7.      Saini, L., Motwani, Y., Singh, S., & Patil, S., “Exploring the Landscape of AI Security: A Taxonomy and Review of Jailbreaking and Prompt Injection,” NCTAAI 4.0 Conference Proceedings, 2025. — D. Y. Patil International University, Pune, India. 8.      Honawade, S. T., Sachin, I. C., Mangala, L., Bharath, S. V. S., & Kumara, S., “Securing LLMs Against Prompt Injection: A Hybrid Rule-Based and Machine Learning Detection Framework,” Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), vol. 12, no. 11, 2025. — Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India. 9.      Dhande, S. N., & Dhande, D. S., “Prompt Security and Bias Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Models,” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), vol. 14, no. 2, 2026, doi: 10.17577/IJERTCONV14IS020157. — Ashoka Center for Business and Computer Studies, Nashik, India. 10.   Kanthale, R., Nagar, H., Shah, A., & Abhang, R., “Automated Software Vulnerability Detection using Large Language Models: A Comparative Study from Cloud to Edge,” Open Access International Journal of Science and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1s, pp. 99–106, 2026, doi: 10.65521/oaijse.v9i1s.3609. — Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) College of Engineering, Pune, India.