Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM56532
Volume:
10 |
2 |
Feb 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Illegal intelligent reflecting surfaces (I-IRSs), i.e., the illegal deployment and utilization of IRSs, impose serious harmful impacts on wireless networks. The existing I-IRS-based illegal jammer (IJ) requires channel state information (CSI) or extra power or both, and therefore, the I-IRS-based IJ seems to be difficult to implement in practical wireless networks. Due to continued sharing of resources, wireless networks often come under security attacks, most common of which are eavesdropping attacks. In the case of eavesdropping attacks, deliberately designed random eavesdropping data is added to the channel. These eavesdropping along with noise result in packet losses and low throughput, degrading the overall performance of the cognitive network. In this work, a security aware jamming and eavesdropping rejection mechanism is proposed which detects suspicious signals in the channel frequency response and employs discrete equalization to recover transmitted data. The proposed approach uses a chaos based FFH protocol for possible adversarial eavesdropping attacks. The error rate and average sum rate show that the proposed system outperforms the exiting systems in terms of the performance metrics.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/1/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...