Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM25128
Volume:
7 |
8 |
Aug 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Shear wall, steel bracing and combined system are the most commonly used lateral-load resisting technique for high-rise buildings. Shear walls have very high in-plane strength and stiffness, which can be used simultaneously for resisting large horizontal and gravity loads. The aim of this study is to examine how well reinforced concrete buildings withstand seismic activity using various systems for resisting lateral loads. In this study, a reinforced concrete building with 12 floors (G+12) and 5 X 5 bays is selected, and various lateral load resisting frame systems are applied in different positions. These are shear wall, bracings, shear wall-bracings combinations (Combined) at five different locations/patterns i.e., at outer corners (Type- I), center of outer sides (Type- II), middle corners (Type- III), center of middle sides (Type- IV), and inner core and middle sides (Type- V) respectively. A total of sixteen models are created for this study, with one being a bare frame and the other fifteen consisting of three types of lateral load resisting systems arranged in five different configurations each. With the assistance of ETABS all models are analyzed by Equivalent Static Analysis and Response Spectrum Analysis. The performance of building is evaluated on the basis of following parameters- maximum storey displacement, maximum storey drift and storey shear. At last the results are compared for different models. Among the three systems, the shear wall system exhibits the least displacement and the highest stiffness. Response of combined system is better than that of bracing system. Overall, the Type II shear wall model is more earthquake-resistant and structurally efficient than the other fifteen models.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
8/16/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...