Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67440

Sensex–Stock Performance Relationship: Evidence from Indian Banking and IT Sectors

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67440

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-14

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67440

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

CHETNA TANSUKHBHAI PARMAR

CHETNA TANSUKHBHAI PARMAR

School of Management & Entrepreneurship

GSFC University

Download Author Certificate
Milee Trikeshbhai Patel

Milee Trikeshbhai Patel

School of Management & Entrepreneurship

GSFC University

Download Co-Author Certificate
CA Sandip Raithaththa

CA Sandip Raithaththa

Character Accountant

Practice

Download Co-Author Certificate
Vasudha Jayeshkumar Lad

Vasudha Jayeshkumar Lad

School of Management & Entrepreneurship

GSFC University

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

The Indian equity market has, over the last five years, been shaped decisively by the performance of two of its most heavily weighted constituents — the Banking sector and the Information Technology (IT) sector. This study examines the relationship between the movement of the SENSEX and the daily price behaviour of five leading banking stocks (State Bank of India, ICICI Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Axis Bank and HDFC Bank) and five leading IT stocks (Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys, HCL Technologies, Wipro and Tech Mahindra) over the period 1 April 2021 to 30 March 2026 (1,239 trading days; 1,238 daily return observations). Using descriptive statistics, Karl Pearson's coefficient of correlation and multiple linear regression, the study finds that SENSEX returns are positively and significantly correlated with the returns of nine of the ten sample stocks, with ICICI Bank (r = 0.683), SBI (r = 0.668) and Axis Bank (r = 0.623) showing the strongest individual co-movement, while Infosys (r = 0.519), TCS (r = 0.507) and Tech Mahindra (r = 0.505) lead the IT segment. A ten-variable multiple regression of SENSEX returns on the returns of all sample stocks explains 77.45 per cent of the variation in SENSEX returns (R² = 0.7745, F = 421.50, p < 0.001), with eight of the ten regression coefficients statistically significant at the 5 per cent level. A supplementary two-factor model using equal-weighted Banking and IT composite returns explains 38.7 per cent of SENSEX return variation (R² = 0.387), with the IT composite (β = 0.312, r = 0.548) exerting a markedly stronger influence on SENSEX returns than the Banking composite (β = 0.099, r = 0.371) over the study period, even though individual banking stocks are, on average, more tightly correlated with the index. The study concludes that both sectors remain key drivers of the SENSEX, that they behave as broadly complementary rather than redundant sources of index risk, and that investors seeking diversification within the large-cap segment of the Indian market should not assume that the two sectors move interchangeably.

KEYWORDS

SENSEX; Banking Sector; Information Technology Sector; Stock Returns; Correlation Analysis; Multiple Regression; Indian Stock Market; Portfolio Diversification.

Cite This Article

CHETNA TANSUKHBHAI PARMAR, Milee Trikeshbhai Patel, CA Sandip Raithaththa, Vasudha Jayeshkumar Lad, "Sensex–Stock Performance Relationship: Evidence from Indian Banking and IT Sectors," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-14, Sep 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67440

Full Article/Conclusion

This study set out to quantify, using a common five-year daily dataset (April 2021-March 2026), the relationship between the SENSEX and the performance of five leading Banking-sector and five leading IT-sector stocks in India. The evidence confirms that both sectors are significant drivers of SENSEX movement: correlation coefficients are positive and moderate-to-strong for nine of the ten sample stocks, and a multiple regression using all ten stocks jointly explains over three-quarters of the variation in SENSEX daily returns. At the level of individual securities, Banking-sector heavyweights — particularly ICICI Bank and SBI — show the single strongest association with the index. Yet when the two sectors are compared on a like-for-like, equal-weighted composite basis, the IT sector emerges as the more consistent and more powerful explanatory factor for SENSEX returns, a result driven by the greater internal homogeneity of the IT sample relative to the Banking sample, in which two constituents (Kotak Mahindra Bank and HDFC Bank) behave quite differently from the index and from their own sector peers. For investors and portfolio managers, the practical implication is twofold. First, both sectors matter to SENSEX performance and neither can be ignored when constructing a portfolio intended to track or outperform the index. Second, and more subtly, 'Banking exposure' and 'IT exposure' are not each internally uniform: within Banking, stock selection makes a material difference to how closely a portfolio will track the index, whereas a broadly diversified IT basket behaves comparatively predictably as a group. Because the two sector composites are only weakly correlated with each other (r = 0.145, computed from the study data), combining exposure to both sectors continues to offer genuine diversification benefit within a large-cap, SENSEX-oriented Indian equity portfolio — the two sectors should be treated as complementary rather than substitutable sources of index-related risk and return. Future research could usefully extend this analysis by (i) incorporating a longer time series spanning multiple interest-rate and global-demand cycles, (ii) applying GARCH-family models to capture time-varying volatility and correlation between the two sectors, as has been done for the Bank Nifty index in isolation, and (iii) examining whether the relative dominance of the IT sector documented here is a stable, structural feature of the Indian market or a period-specific artefact of the particular five-year window (2021-2026) studied, which spans both the post-pandemic recovery in IT services demand and a subsequent normalisation phase.

References

Agarwalla, S. K., Varma, J. R., & Virmani, V. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on tail risk: Evidence from Nifty index options. Economics Letters, 204, 109878. Al-Awadhi, A. M., Alsaifi, K., Al-Awadhi, A., & Alhammadi, S. (2020). Death and contagious infectious diseases: Impact of the COVID-19 virus on stock market returns. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 27, 100326. Alam, M. N., Alam, M. S., & Chavali, K. (2020). Stock market response during COVID-19 lockdown period in India: An event study. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(7), 131-137. Arora, R. K. (2016). The relationship between investment of domestic and foreign institutional investors and stock market returns in India. Indian Journal of Finance and Economics, 12(2), 44-58. Ashri, D., Sahoo, B. P., Gulati, A., & Haq, I. U. (2021). Repercussions of COVID-19 on the Indian stock market: A sectoral analysis. In Advances in Business and Management Forecasting. Springer. Awalakki, M. (2022). Neurotransmitters impact on emotional responses and decision-making in investment: A comprehensive exploration. International Journal of Food and Nutritional Sciences, 11(5), 690-708. Awalakki, M., & Archanna. (2021). A study on accounting ratios and stock returns with reference to National Stock Exchange of India. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(7), 6858-6888. Awalakki, M., & Archanna. (2023). Exploring the dynamics of investor attention and market volatility: A behavioral finance perspective. International Journal of Science and Research, 12(8), 2245-2251. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR23823155339 Bai, J., & Perron, P. (1998). Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica, 66(1), 47-78. Bardoliwala, H. N. (2023). The relationship between interest rates and stock market performance. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(6).

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/24/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

6

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...