Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM27915
Volume:
8 |
1 |
Jan 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In this paper, the focus is on sentiment analysis of web 3.0 enabled twitter dataset. The objective of the project is to explore various methods for performing sentiment analysis on Twitter datasets and implementing these methods on the web3.0 Twitter platform. The project involves collecting Twitter data through blockchain-based applications, preprocessing the data to remove noise, and applying machine learning models for sentiment analysis. Sentiment analysis is simply the extraction of thoughts, ideas, opinions, and emotions from sources such as text, speech, tweets, and databases using natural language processing (NLP) This process involves text segmentation mentally makes it “good,” “bad,” and “neutral” groups. In addition, it is known by other terms such as objective evaluation, mindfulness mining, and rating extraction. Web 3.0, also known as Web3, represents the third contemplated iteration of the World Wide Web, which aspires to establish a connected, transparent and intelligent online environment Based on the concept of decentralization, blockchain technology and the implementation of token-based economies. The main outcome of the project is to gain insights into the sentiment of users by analyzing WEB3.0 enabled Twitter data. By implementing sentiment analysis techniques on a WEB3.0 enabled Twitter dataset, the project aims to contribute to the field of sentiment analysis and showcase the effectiveness of using WEB3.0 enabled for data collection and analysis. The project aims to provide valuable insights for various methods of sentiment analysis for researchers.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45298
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...