Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67651

Sentiment Analysis Using Large Language Models : A Review

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67651

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-7

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67651

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

SAS

Simran A. Sodha

Computer Science and Engineering

Dr. Subhash University

Download Author Certificate
PNJS

Prof. Neeta J. Sapara

Computer Engineering

Dr. Subhash University

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Sentiment analysis is an important Natural Language Processing (NLP) task for identifying opinions, attitudes, and emotional polarity in user-generated text. Recent research has examined Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, Gemini, GPT-4, LLaMA, and related models for zero-shot, few-shot, prompt-based, multilingual, and aspect-based sentiment analysis. Compared with conventional supervised approaches, LLMs provide flexible natural-language task formulation, but published studies also report challenges related to consistency, domain adaptation, multilingual performance, fine-grained classification, sarcasm, explainability, and computational cost This paper presents a review of sentiment analysis using Large Language Models, with particular attention to user reviews and the analysis of generative-AI applications. The review covers traditional feature-based methods, LLM prompting and classification approaches, multilingual and aspect-based sentiment analysis, and application-oriented review mining. A five-class sentiment framework — very negative, negative, neutral, positive, and very positive — is considered as a fine-grained alternative to binary classification. The review further identifies research gaps involving binary-class limitations, dataset size and diversity, domain adaptation, and reliable evaluation. These observations motivate the proposed study of Google Gemini mobile-application reviews using TF-IDF and machine-learning classifiers, with evaluation through Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1-score.

KEYWORDS

Sentiment Analysis Large Language Models Natural Language Processing Fine-Grained Sentiment Analysis Gemini User Reviews.

Cite This Article

Simran A. Sodha, Prof. Neeta J. Sapara, "Sentiment Analysis Using Large Language Models : A Review," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-7, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67651

Full Article/Conclusion

This review examined sentiment analysis using Large Language Models and summarized research involving multilingual classification, aspect-based analysis, social-media sentiment, user reviews, and comparisons between LLMs and traditional machine-learning approaches. The literature shows that LLMs offer flexible prompt-based capabilities, but their performance depends on the task, domain, language, prompting strategy, and evaluation setting. The review also highlights the limitation of binary sentiment analysis for applications where neutral opinions and subtle dissatisfaction are important. A five-class framework can provide a more detailed representation of user feedback. For the proposed Google Gemini review-analysis study, TF-IDF and machine-learning classifiers provide a clear baseline, while Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1-score provide standard evaluation measures. Future research can extend this work through larger datasets, multilingual and aspect-based analysis, LLM-versus-ML comparisons, explainability, and real-time monitoring. These directions can support the development of more systematic and reliable sentiment-analysis systems for generative-AI applications.

References

[1]     Krugmann, Jan Ole, and Jochen Hartmann. "Sentiment analysis in the age of generative AI." Customer Needs and Solutions 11.1 (2024): 3. [2]     Šmíd, Jakub, Pavel Přibáň, and Pavel Kral. "LLaMA-based models for aspect-based sentiment analysis." Proceedings of the 14th workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity, sentiment, & social media analysis. 2024. [3]     Wojdecka, Agnieszka, Jakub Gromadziński, and Krzysztof Walczak. "Effectiveness of large language models and software libraries in sentiment analysis." Applied Computer Science 21.2 (2025). [4]     Jin, J. "Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models for Real-World Sentiment Classification on Social Media." ADVANCES IN ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT  AND  POLITICAL  SCIENCES Учредители: Eliwise Academy Ltd 156.1 (2025): 214- 224. [5]     Bojić, Ljubiša, et al. "Comparing large Language models and human annotators in latent content analysis of sentiment, political leaning, emotional intensity and sarcasm." Scientific reports 15.1 (2025): 11477. [6]     Alabduljabbar, Reham. "User-centric AI: evaluating the usability of generative AI applications through user reviews on app stores." PeerJ Computer Science 10 (2024): e2421. [7]      Demirbilek, Mustafa, and Sevim Özulukale Demirbilek. "Restaurant Review Sentiment and SWOT Analysis: using AWS and GPT-4 Large Language Models." Acta Infologica 9.2 (2025): 491-511. [8]      Niimi, Junichiro. "Dynamic sentiment analysis with local large language models using majority voting: A study on factors affecting restaurant evaluation." arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13069 (2024). [9]      Wang, Zengzhi, et al. "Is ChatGPT a good sentiment analyzer? A preliminary study." arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.04339 (2023). [10]  Zhang, Wenxuan, et al. "Sentiment analysis in the era of large language models: A reality check." Findings of the association for computational linguistics: NAACL 2024. 2024.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/3/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

12

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...