Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM65745

Serverless LLM Platform - A Technology Architecture Blueprint for Function-Style LLM Deployment

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM65745

Volume:

10 |

7 |

Jul 2026

Pages:

1-16

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM65745

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

JSS

Jagpreet Singh Sasan

Independent Researcher

Independent Researcher

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Developers want large language models delivered the way modern compute is delivered: deploy a function, call it, pay per use, and never think about machines. But applying the ordinary serverless mental model — a fresh process or virtual machine per invocation — to LLM inference is a category error. An LLM's weights are enormous, shared, long-lived state. Spinning up a new model server per call optimizes the cheap part (the function sandbox) while repeatedly paying the most expensive part (moving tens of gigabytes of weights into accelerator memory). This blueprint resolves that tension with a single organizing idea: be serverless at the API and accounting boundary, but run persistent, shared, model-aware execution cells beneath it. Untrusted function logic runs in a small CPU sandbox that never owns an accelerator; it sends one validated, high-level generation request to a resident inference cell that multiplexes many tenants, owns the model weights and key-value (KV) memory, performs batching, and streams tokens back.

KEYWORDS

Serverless at the API and accounting boundary; persistent shared model-aware execution cells beneath it.

Cite This Article

Jagpreet Singh Sasan, "Serverless LLM Platform - A Technology Architecture Blueprint for Function-Style LLM Deployment," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1-16, Jul 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM65745

Full Article/Conclusion

The winning system is not "a conventional function platform with a GPU attached." It is a model-residency and token-scheduling platform exposed as functions. Its fast path is created by compiling most functions into safe prompt bytecode, doing static work at deployment, keeping the right weights and prefixes resident, routing straight to the cell most likely to produce the first token soonest, batching only within each request's deadline budget, isolating general user code in CPU microVMs while leaving shared inference outside, reserving resources before accepting work, and streaming immediately while accounting at the point of execution. KVM belongs to the security architecture; shared inference cells provide the execution architecture; and scale-to-zero is a selectable operating mode, not a universal rule. Performance improves through sensible residency, short request paths, fair scheduling, controlled batching, and transparent service classes — never through a single absolute latency promise. Call to action: Begin with the simulator and the single-host hot slice. Establish the latency budget, prove the inference and scheduling thesis on one model and one accelerator, and let measured workload data — not architectural ambition — pace the path to a multiplexed, multi-region, density-optimized platform.

References

·       TTFT (time-to-first-token) — elapsed time from request arrival to the first streamed token. ·       Prefill — processing the input prompt to populate KV state before decoding begins. ·       Decode — autoregressive generation of output tokens, one iteration at a time. ·       KV cache / KV pages — per-sequence key/value attention state; here managed as fixed-size paged allocations. ·       Prefix cache — reusable KV for a shared leading token sequence, keyed by model, tokenizer, adapter, exact tokens, attention options, and privacy namespace. ·       Continuous batching — forming and re-forming batches at each model iteration rather than per request. ·       Inference cell — a persistent, shared execution unit owning weights, KV memory, batching, and sampling for a model version. ·       Adapter — a small per-function low-rank weight delta applied over a resident base model. ·       MicroVM — a minimal KVM virtual machine used to isolate untrusted CPU function code (no accelerator, no default network). ·       Residency — where a model's weights currently live across the HBM → host RAM → NVMe → rack → region hierarchy. ·       Alias — a mutable atomic pointer (e.g., production) to an immutable function/model version. ·       Goodput — useful completed work per unit time (distinct from raw throughput).

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

7/2/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

2

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

76

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...