Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68623
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Airtificial Intelligence and machine Learning
Aissms collage of engineering,pune
Airtificial Intelligence and machine Learning
Aissms collage of engineering,pune
Electrocardiogram (ECG)-based biometric authentication uses physiological signals to verify a claimed identity. Its practical performance depends not only on the classifier but also on acquisition conditions, preprocessing, segmentation, feature representation, and the protocol used to evaluate genuine and impostor attempts. This paper presents a proposed study of ECG signal processing for biometric verification, with particular attention to signal quality and cross-session variability. A staged pipeline is outlined, beginning with a conventional feature-based baseline and progressing to quality-aware processing and, where data permit, learned representations. The proposed evaluation separates enrollment and verification data and emphasizes false acceptance rate, false rejection rate, equal error rate, and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Public ECG databases, including ECG-ID, are considered as candidate resources, subject to their suitability for the final protocol. No experimental results are claimed in this draft; the contribution is a reproducible study design to be refined after a focused review and implementation .
KEYWORDS
ECG-based biometric authentication depends on effective signal preprocessing, reliable quality assessment, and appropriate verification protocols. The reviewed literature highlights the importance of distinguishing identification from verification and evaluating systems using metrics such as FAR, FRR, and EER. Signal quality and cross-session variations remain important challenges that can affect authentication reliability. Quality-based rejection may improve the reliability of accepted signals but can also reduce system coverage. Fair evaluation requires proper data partitioning, clear reporting of experimental settings, and prevention of data leakage. Furthermore, differences in datasets and acquisition conditions limit the generalizability of existing findings. Future research should explore advanced computational approaches for ECG feature learning and authentication, while addressing security, privacy, and robustness under varying recording conditions, to support the development of reliable and practical ECG-based biometric systems.These considerations can support the development of more reliable and practical ECG-based biometric authentication systems.
[1] “ECG-Based Biometric Recognition: A Survey of Methods and Databases,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 6, Art. no. 1864, 2025, doi: 10.3390/s25061864. [2] “Biometric Recognition: A Systematic Review on Electrocardiogram Data Acquisition Methods,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 3, Art. no. 1507, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23031507. [3] “ECG Signal Feature Extraction Trends in Methods and Applications,” BioMedical Engineering OnLine, vol. 22, Art. no. 22, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12938-023-01075-1. [4] P. Melzi, R. Tolosana, and R. Vera-Rodriguez, “ECG Biometric Recognition: Review, System Proposal, and Benchmark Evaluation,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 15555–15566, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3244651. [5] T. S. Lugovaya, “Biometric Human Identification Based on Electrocardiogram,” M.S. thesis, Electrotechnical Univ. LETI, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2005. ECG-ID database, PhysioNet. [6] A. R. J. Mitchell, D. Ahlert, C. Brown, M. Birge, and A. Gibbs, “Electrocardiogram-based biometrics for user identification—Using your heartbeat as a digital key,” Journal of Electrocardiology, vol. 80, pp. 1–6, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.04.001. [7] “Deep Learning-Powered ECG-Based Biometric Authentication,” in Proc. 2023 Int. Conf. Next-Generation Computing, IoT and Machine Learning (NCIM), 2023, doi: 10.1109/NCIM59001.2023.10212845.
Publication Date
10/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...