Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM16512
Volume:
6 |
10 |
Oct 2022
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Abstract: The issue of distinguishing a user’s genuine signatures from those that have been altered or forgeries is addressed by signature verification. In the presence of large intra-class and low inter-class variabilities, the challenge is in determining the allowed variations in a user’s signatures. A non-rigid object match with extremely comparable classes can be employed to describe the issue. In the realm of biometrics, signatures are regarded as a behavioral biometric, and the problem presents more challenges compared to other modalities (such as fingerprints) because of the additional difficulty of competent forgeries. The captured value of handwritten signatures is distinct and nearly impossible to duplicate, in contrast to a password, PIN, or key card—identification that may be lost, stolen, or traded. Since signatures are already recognised as a widespread means of confirming identity, they have a significant advantage over other types of technology. The demand for authorizations based on signatures has increased, and examples include checks, contracts, contracts, security systems, financial systems, and credit card validation. The Automatic Signature Verification method competes with the existing visual verification system, which is reliant on the verifier’s background, disposition, and working environment. The ratios between the lines and angles of a real signature and a false signature are very tough for any expert’s eyes to accurately verify.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/9/2022
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...