Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM44580
Volume:
9 |
4 |
Apr 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In the evolving landscape of financial transactions, ensuring the security and authenticity of signature verification on bank cheques is vital to prevent fraud. This paper presents a survey of techniques used in signature verification, covering traditional image processing methods such as feature extraction, edge detection, and shape analysis, alongside modern deep learning approaches like Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), and hybrid models. The survey explores key challenges, including handwriting variations, image noise, and the need for reliable real-world systems. Solutions such as pre-processing techniques, data augmentation, and transfer learning are discussed to improve accuracy. Commonly used datasets for training and evaluating models are reviewed, highlighting their features and limitations. The paper also considers ethical concerns such as fairness, transparency, and the broader implications of deploying such systems in financial institutions. By integrating insights from both traditional and advanced methods, this survey provides a valuable reference for researchers and practitioners aiming to enhance the accuracy, robustness, and reliability of signature verification systems. Strengthening these systems contributes to the overall integrity and trust in digital financial transactions.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/15/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...