Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM60386
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Verification of offline signatures is still a difficult problem to match because of the lack of dynamic writing of information that is clubbed together like pen pressure and stroke order. Because of this, authentication would be wholly based on visual properties, and thus there would be a hard time to tell an authentic signature and one that has been well made forgery. The work introduces a deep-layered approach to enhancement of reliability of the potential application of the methods of the authentication of the statical signature. There are two levels of structure in the system. The initial step revolves around detection of digitally produced or distorted signatures in the form of a convolutional model trained to detect irregular texture and structural features. The second phase conducts specific comparison between signatures based on the use of a Siamese network, which considers the similarity based on the encoded feature representations. In order to enhance interpretability, a visual comparison mechanism is integrated to accentuate the discrepancy of reference and test signature to enable better comprehension of the mismatch areas. The system is also trained and tested on several class signature data where the system performs consistently when differentiating real and fake samples with different writing patterns.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/16/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...