Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:10.55041/IJSREM.ISTCESD009

Silicon Nanoparticles for Battery Electrodes: From Synthesis to Solid-State Integration

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

10.55041/IJSREM.ISTCESD009

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-7

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/ijsrem.ISTCESD009

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

AVB

Abhijit V. Bachute

Department of Chemistry,

Sambhaji Kendre Mahavidyalaya, Jalkot, Latur, MS, India

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Silicon nanoparticles are widely regarded as the most viable near-term route to high-capacity anodes for both liquid-electrolyte lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and emerging all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs). This review traces the silicon anode research pipeline from the bottom up: beginning with nanoparticle synthesis, moving through electrode-level composite integration and liquid-electrolyte interphase behavior, and concluding with the distinct set of challenges that arise when silicon nanoparticles are integrated into solid-state cells. We compare the major synthesis routes — ball milling, magnesiothermic and aluminothermic reduction, chemical/electrochemical etching, chemical vapor deposition, and hydrothermal synthesis — in terms of scalability, cost, and the nanostructures they yield. We then discuss how particle size, morphology, and surface chemistry govern solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation in conventional liquid electrolytes, and how the same design variables govern solid–solid contact stability when silicon is paired with sulfide, oxide, or polymer solid electrolytes. Recurring engineering strategies — carbon/oxide coatings, composite architectures, artificial interphases, and stack-pressure management — are examined across both electrolyte classes to identify where solutions transfer directly and where solid-state integration demands fundamentally different design rules. The review closes with an assessment of remaining scalability, safety, and manufacturing barriers and identifies research directions most likely to accelerate commercial adoption of silicon nanoparticle anodes.

KEYWORDS

silicon nanoparticles; anode synthesis; solid electrolyte interphase; all-solid-state battery; lithium-ion battery; electrode integration

Cite This Article

Abhijit V. Bachute, "Silicon Nanoparticles for Battery Electrodes: From Synthesis to Solid-State Integration," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-7, Sep 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem.ISTCESD009

Full Article/Conclusion

Silicon nanoparticle synthesis has matured substantially, with ball milling, magnesiothermic reduction, etching, CVD, and hydrothermal methods now offering a broad toolkit for tailoring particle size, morphology, and porosity to specific performance and manufacturing requirements. These synthesis-level advances have meaningfully improved mechanical tolerance to volumetric cycling, but the interfacial problem — SEI instability in liquid electrolytes and the combined chemical and mechanical fragility of solid–solid contact in ASSBs — remains the central bottleneck to commercialization. Critically, solid-state integration introduces design requirements that are not simply inherited from liquid-electrolyte engineering: stack-pressure management, electrolyte-class-specific interphase chemistry, and processing methods that preserve solid–solid contact area is unique to ASSBs and demand dedicated research attention. Continued integration of scalable nanoparticle synthesis, tailored interphase engineering, and cell-level mechanical design — supported by operando characterization and multiphysics modeling — offers the clearest path toward silicon nanoparticle anodes that are viable in both liquid-electrolyte and solid-state battery platforms.

References

[1]             A. A. Pavlovskii, K. Pushnitsa, A. Kosenko, P. Novikov, and A. A. Popovich, "Nanostructured silicon anodes for lithium-ion batteries: Advances, challenges, and future prospects," Materials, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 281, 2026, doi: 10.3390/ma19020281. [2]             Z. Zhang, Y. Wu, Z. Mo, X. Lei, X. Xie, X. Xue, H. Qin, and H. Jiang, “Research progress of silicon-based anode materials for lithium-ion batteries,” RSC Adv., vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 10731–10753. [3]             K. Askaruly, Z. Supiyeva, S. Azat, Y. Yeszhan, X. Pan, K. Ozoemena, S. Dsoke, and Q. Abbas, "From electrochemical performance to mechanical issues: A review on silicon anode architectures for advanced lithium-ion batteries," J. Power Sources, vol. 659, p. 238423, 2025. [4]             L. Köbbing, A. Latz, and B. Horstmann, “Voltage hysteresis of silicon nanoparticles: Chemo-mechanical particle-SEI model,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 34, no. 7, Art. no. 2308818, 2024. [5]             X. Zuo, J. Zhu, P. Müller-Buschbaum, and Y.-J. Cheng, "Silicon based lithium-ion battery anodes: A chronicle perspective review," Nano Energy, vol. 31, pp. 113–143, 2017. [6]             H. Nomura and K. Sato, "Cycle life improvement of lithium-ion batteries using particle size controlled silicon nanoparticle anodes," Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 64, p. 09SP09, 2025, doi: 10.35848/1347-4065/adfb83. [7]             C. Zhang, F. Wang, J. Han, S. Bai, J. Tan, J. Liu, and F. Li, "Challenges and recent progress on silicon-based anode materials for next-generation lithium-ion batteries," Small Struct., vol. 2, p. 2100009, 2021. [8]             T. Xiong, Q. Chen, S. Wei, J. Xie, J. Du, J. Zhu, and R. Zhu, “Ball-milling-assisted magnesiothermic reduction of clay minerals to nano-Si as high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes,” Nano Lett., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 341–350, 2026. [9]             P. A. Sánchez, K. Thangaian, O. A. Øie, A. Gaarud, M. Rodríguez Gomez, V. Diadkin, J. Campo, F. H. Cova, and M. V. Blanco, "Toward the controlled synthesis of nanostructured Si and SiOx anodes for Li-ion batteries via SiO2 magnesiothermic reduction reaction," ACS Appl. Energy Mater., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2249–2259, 2025, doi: 10.1021/acsaem.4c02836. [10]          M. Yan, S. Martell, S. V. Patwardhan, and M. Dasog, “Key developments in magnesiothermic reduction of silica: Insights into reactivity and future prospects,” ChemRxiv, 2024.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/28/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...