Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM.ISTCESD009
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Chemistry,
Sambhaji Kendre Mahavidyalaya, Jalkot, Latur, MS, India
Silicon nanoparticles are widely regarded as the most viable near-term route to high-capacity anodes for both liquid-electrolyte lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and emerging all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs). This review traces the silicon anode research pipeline from the bottom up: beginning with nanoparticle synthesis, moving through electrode-level composite integration and liquid-electrolyte interphase behavior, and concluding with the distinct set of challenges that arise when silicon nanoparticles are integrated into solid-state cells. We compare the major synthesis routes — ball milling, magnesiothermic and aluminothermic reduction, chemical/electrochemical etching, chemical vapor deposition, and hydrothermal synthesis — in terms of scalability, cost, and the nanostructures they yield. We then discuss how particle size, morphology, and surface chemistry govern solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation in conventional liquid electrolytes, and how the same design variables govern solid–solid contact stability when silicon is paired with sulfide, oxide, or polymer solid electrolytes. Recurring engineering strategies — carbon/oxide coatings, composite architectures, artificial interphases, and stack-pressure management — are examined across both electrolyte classes to identify where solutions transfer directly and where solid-state integration demands fundamentally different design rules. The review closes with an assessment of remaining scalability, safety, and manufacturing barriers and identifies research directions most likely to accelerate commercial adoption of silicon nanoparticle anodes.
KEYWORDS
Silicon nanoparticle synthesis has matured substantially, with ball milling, magnesiothermic reduction, etching, CVD, and hydrothermal methods now offering a broad toolkit for tailoring particle size, morphology, and porosity to specific performance and manufacturing requirements. These synthesis-level advances have meaningfully improved mechanical tolerance to volumetric cycling, but the interfacial problem — SEI instability in liquid electrolytes and the combined chemical and mechanical fragility of solid–solid contact in ASSBs — remains the central bottleneck to commercialization. Critically, solid-state integration introduces design requirements that are not simply inherited from liquid-electrolyte engineering: stack-pressure management, electrolyte-class-specific interphase chemistry, and processing methods that preserve solid–solid contact area is unique to ASSBs and demand dedicated research attention. Continued integration of scalable nanoparticle synthesis, tailored interphase engineering, and cell-level mechanical design — supported by operando characterization and multiphysics modeling — offers the clearest path toward silicon nanoparticle anodes that are viable in both liquid-electrolyte and solid-state battery platforms.
[1] A. A. Pavlovskii, K. Pushnitsa, A. Kosenko, P. Novikov, and A. A. Popovich, "Nanostructured silicon anodes for lithium-ion batteries: Advances, challenges, and future prospects," Materials, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 281, 2026, doi: 10.3390/ma19020281. [2] Z. Zhang, Y. Wu, Z. Mo, X. Lei, X. Xie, X. Xue, H. Qin, and H. Jiang, “Research progress of silicon-based anode materials for lithium-ion batteries,” RSC Adv., vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 10731–10753. [3] K. Askaruly, Z. Supiyeva, S. Azat, Y. Yeszhan, X. Pan, K. Ozoemena, S. Dsoke, and Q. Abbas, "From electrochemical performance to mechanical issues: A review on silicon anode architectures for advanced lithium-ion batteries," J. Power Sources, vol. 659, p. 238423, 2025. [4] L. Köbbing, A. Latz, and B. Horstmann, “Voltage hysteresis of silicon nanoparticles: Chemo-mechanical particle-SEI model,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 34, no. 7, Art. no. 2308818, 2024. [5] X. Zuo, J. Zhu, P. Müller-Buschbaum, and Y.-J. Cheng, "Silicon based lithium-ion battery anodes: A chronicle perspective review," Nano Energy, vol. 31, pp. 113–143, 2017. [6] H. Nomura and K. Sato, "Cycle life improvement of lithium-ion batteries using particle size controlled silicon nanoparticle anodes," Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 64, p. 09SP09, 2025, doi: 10.35848/1347-4065/adfb83. [7] C. Zhang, F. Wang, J. Han, S. Bai, J. Tan, J. Liu, and F. Li, "Challenges and recent progress on silicon-based anode materials for next-generation lithium-ion batteries," Small Struct., vol. 2, p. 2100009, 2021. [8] T. Xiong, Q. Chen, S. Wei, J. Xie, J. Du, J. Zhu, and R. Zhu, “Ball-milling-assisted magnesiothermic reduction of clay minerals to nano-Si as high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes,” Nano Lett., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 341–350, 2026. [9] P. A. Sánchez, K. Thangaian, O. A. Øie, A. Gaarud, M. Rodríguez Gomez, V. Diadkin, J. Campo, F. H. Cova, and M. V. Blanco, "Toward the controlled synthesis of nanostructured Si and SiOx anodes for Li-ion batteries via SiO2 magnesiothermic reduction reaction," ACS Appl. Energy Mater., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2249–2259, 2025, doi: 10.1021/acsaem.4c02836. [10] M. Yan, S. Martell, S. V. Patwardhan, and M. Dasog, “Key developments in magnesiothermic reduction of silica: Insights into reactivity and future prospects,” ChemRxiv, 2024.
Publication Date
9/28/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...