Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67653

Slm vs Llm: A comparative study on cost, efficiency and enterprise adoption

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67653

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-4

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Bhumika Shinde

Bhumika Shinde

Department of Information technology and Computer science

D. G. Ruparel College of arts, science and commerce

Download Author Certificate
Aarti Gawai

Aarti Gawai

Department of Information technology and Computer science

D. G. Ruparel College of arts, science and commerce

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Language models now support tasks ranging from customer service to code generation, and organizations must decide whether a compact model or a frontier-scale model suits each workload. This paper compares Small Language Models and Large Language Models (LLMs) on three dimensions: operational efficiency, cost, and enterprise adoption. The study is a secondary-data analysis based on published model papers, technical reports, and vendor documentation, supported by a transparent total-cost-of-ownership (TCO) model whose assumptions are stated openly. The analysis shows that SLMs need far less memory and hardware, can run on a single consumer-grade GPU after quantization, and become cheaper than API-based access once monthly request volume passes roughly one million under the assumed conditions. LLMs remain stronger in multi-step reasoning and open-ended problems. Adoption follows organizational maturity: firms with limited ML staff favor managed LLM APIs, while technically mature teams increasingly self-host SLMs. The paper proposes a routing-based hybrid strategy that sends each request to the smallest model able to handle it, and concludes that the choice is a matter of workload fit rather than a contest between two model classes.

KEYWORDS

Small Language Models Large Language Models Model Efficiency Total Cost of Ownership Enterprise Adoption Quantization Inference

Cite This Article

Bhumika Shinde, Aarti Gawai, "Slm vs Llm: A comparative study on cost, efficiency and enterprise adoption," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-4, Oct 2026.

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper compared small and large language models on efficiency, cost, and adoption. SLMs require much less memory and hardware, can be served locally, and, under the stated assumptions, repay their upfront cost within roughly a year at about one million requests per month, sooner at higher volume or when compared with premium APIs. LLMs retain their advantage for complex reasoning and novel problems. Adoption follows technical maturity, data-governance needs, and workload volume. The results indicate that the question is not which model class is better but which is right for each task. A routing-based hybrid, using SLMs for frequent well-defined work and LLMs for hard cases, offers a practical way to balance quality, cost, and control.

References

1.      A. Vaswani et al., “Attention Is All You Need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 30, 2017. arXiv:1706.03762. 2.      T. Brown et al., “Language Models are Few-Shot Learners,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 33, 2020. arXiv:2005.14165. 3.      H. Touvron et al., “Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models,” arXiv:2307.09288, 2023. 4.      A. Q. Jiang et al., “Mistral 7B,” arXiv:2310.06825, 2023. 5.      M. Abdin et al., “Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phone,” arXiv:2404.14219, 2024. 6.      G. Hinton, O. Vinyals, and J. Dean, “Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network,” arXiv:1503.02531, 2015. 7.      T. Dettmers, A. Pagnoni, A. Holtzman, and L. Zettlemoyer, “QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 36, 2023. arXiv:2305.14314. 8.      W. Kwon et al., “Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention,” in Proc. ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), 2023. arXiv:2309.06180. 9.      L. Chen, M. Zaharia, and J. Zou, “FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performance,” arXiv:2305.05176, 2023. 10.   P. Belcak et al., “Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AI,” arXiv:2506.02153, 2025.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/5/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

7

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...