Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67730
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Computer science ai&ml
Sushant university
Computer science ai&ml
Sushant university
The rapid growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) has transformed residential living spaces into intelligent environments capable of sensing, reasoning, and acting with minimal human intervention. This paper presents a five-layer, edge-assisted architecture for smart home automation that integrates heterogeneous sensors and actuators, multi-protocol connectivity (Zigbee, Z-Wave, BLE, Wi-Fi, and Thread), a local rule engine, and cloud-based machine learning. A comparative study of communication protocols is provided, and a hybrid decision pipeline that combines deterministic rules with learned occupancy prediction is proposed. A simulated four-room apartment testbed with 24 devices is used to evaluate energy consumption, command latency, and prediction accuracy. Results indicate a 28.8% reduction in monthly energy use, a latency reduction from 820 ms (cloud-routed Wi-Fi) to below 100 ms for local Zigbee and Thread control, and an occupancy-prediction accuracy of 94.6% using an LSTM model. Security and privacy threats are analyzed and mitigation strategies are discussed. The findings support edge-first designs as a practical path to responsive, efficient, and privacy-aware smart homes.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented an edge-assisted, five-layer architecture for smart home automation and evaluated it through simulation. The hybrid decision pipeline combining rule-based control with learned occupancy prediction reduced monthly energy consumption by 28.8%, lowered command latency to under 100 ms for local Zigbee and Thread control compared with 820 ms for cloud-routed Wi-Fi, and attained 94.6% occupancy prediction accuracy with an LSTM model. The protocol comparison and security analysis provide practical guidance for system designers. Future work will deploy the system in physical homes, integrate Matter-native devices, and explore federated learning for privacy-preserving personalization.
[1] J. Gubbi, R. Buyya, S. Marusic, and M. Palaniswami, “Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions,” Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1645–1660, 2013. [2]C. Perera, A. Zaslavsky, P. Christen, and D. Georgakopoulos, “Context aware computing for the Internet of Things: A survey,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 414–454, 1st Quart., 2014. [3] A. Banks and R. Gupta, Eds., MQTT Version 3.1.1, OASIS Standard, Oct. 2014. [4] A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash, “Internet of Things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347–2376, 4th Quart., 2015. [5] H. Ghayvat, S. Mukhopadhyay, X. Gui, and N. Suryadevara, “WSN-and IoT-based smart homes and their extension to smart buildings,” Sensors, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 10350–10379, 2015. [6] E. Fernandes, J. Jung, and A. Prakash, “Security analysis of emerging smart home applications,” in Proc. IEEE Symp. Security Privacy (SP), San Jose, CA, USA, 2016, pp. 636–654. [7] W. Shi, J. Cao, Q. Zhang, Y. Li, and L. Xu, “Edge computing: Vision and challenges,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 637–646, Oct. 2016. [8] IEEE Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Networks, IEEE Std 802.15.4-2015, 2016. [9] B. L. R. Stojkoska and K. V. Trivodaliev, “A review of Internet of Things for smart home: Challenges and solutions,” J. Cleaner Prod., vol. 140, pp. 1454–1464, 2017. [10] M. Alaa, A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zaidan, M. Talal, and M. L. M. Kiah, “A review of smart home applications based on Internet of Things,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 97, pp. 48–65, 2017.
Publication Date
10/7/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...